Dr Ruhul Amin Bepari vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 5114 Gua

Gauhati High Court

Dr Ruhul Amin Bepari vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 29 May, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

                                                                  Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010149552024




                                                           undefined

                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : Review.Pet./137/2024
                                    In WP(C)/5578/2020

         DR RUHUL AMIN BEPARI
         S/O M U BEPARI, RESIDENT OF LAKHIMARI, DIST DHUBRI ASSAM, 78334


         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
         OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6

         2:DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
         ASSAM

          KAHILIPARA
          GUWAHATI 19

         3:PRINCIPAL
          BHOLANATH COLLEGE
          DHUBRI


         4:BHOLANATH COLLEGE.
          DHUBRI
          REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY
          DIST DHUBRI
         ASSAM

         5:SELECTION COMMITTEE

         CONSTITUTED BY THE BHOLANATH COLLEGE
         DHUBRI FOR INTERVIEW HELD ON 10.12.2020 FOR SELECTION OF
         ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY IN BN COLLEGE
         DHUBRI
                                                                       Page No.# 2/2

             REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
             DHUBR

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR D MAHANTA,

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR. A BORUA (R-3)




                                   BEFORE
                  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

                                        ORDER

29-05-2025 Heard Shri D. Mahanta, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Shri K. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department as well as Shri A. Borua, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 to 5.

Hearing is concluded.

Judgment is reserved.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant