Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/5 vs The State Of Assam
2025 Latest Caselaw 5054 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5054 Gua
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2025

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/5 vs The State Of Assam on 28 May, 2025

                                                                        Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010108952025




                                                                 2025:GAU-AS:6826

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/2765/2025

            MD KHALED AKTAR CHOUDHURY
            S/O- LATE ABDUS SAHID, VILL- JABDA, P.O- MANIKGANJ, DIST-
            SRIBHUMI, ASSAM



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY , GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
            06

            2:THE CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC)
             FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

            3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
            TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PERSONNEL DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

            4:THE SECRETARY
            TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPTT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DISPUR
            GUWAHATI 6

            5:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
            ASSAM
             KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19

            6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL
            COMMITTEE (DLC)
             KARIMGANJ FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND
            KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN 78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MRS R BEGUM, MS. S B CHOUDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU
                                                                       Page No.# 2/5




                                  BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR

                                    ORDER

Date : 28.05.2025

Heard Ms. S. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Konwar, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 and Ms. S. Chutia, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

2. The father of the petitioner late Md. Abdus Shahid, while serving as Head Teacher in the Sarapur M. E. School under the Badarpur Elementary Education Block, in Karimganj district, died in harness on 20.03.2014. Thereafter, the petitioner made an application for appointment on compassionate grounds on 04.09.2017. However, as the case of the petitioner was not placed before the concerned DLC, the petitioner approached this Court by filing WP(C)/6335/2023, which was disposed of on 22.11.2023, directing the District Elementary Education Officer, Karimganj to firstly verify from the records as to whether any such application has been made by the petitioner and if any such application is available on record, the same be placed before the DLC concerned for its consideration.

3. The District Level Committee, Karimganj in its meeting held on 30.11.2023, recommended the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in a vacant post of Assistant Teacher in the L.P Level School.

4. In the meantime the Personnel (B) Department, Government of Assam, Page No.# 3/5

issued an Office Memorandum on 18.09.2024, wherein it is stated that no cases for appointment on compassionate ground to the family member of State Government employees who died-in-harness or retired prematurely on being declared permanently incapacitated for service or missing and whose whereabouts is not known prior to 31.03.2017, shall be entertained by any Administrative Department/Authority for any reason whatsoever nor be placed before the SLCs/DLCs for recommendation of candidates for appointment on compassionate ground.

5. The said Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, was challenged in a number of writ petitions and the leading case was WP(C) No. 342 of 2025. This batch of writ petitions were disposed of by an Order dated 03.04.2025, wherein, the operative portion reads as under:

" 9. In view of the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, all the writ petitions that are pending as on today, i.e., 03.04.2025, in the Gauhati High Court, which have put to challenge the impugned OM dated 18.09.2024, are to be decided as follows:-

(i) All the applications for compassionate appointment submitted by the petitioners shall be considered and disposed of by the concerned DLC/SLC on merit, by taking into consideration the various guidelines prior to 01.04.2017, laid down by the State Government for compassionate appointment and the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court. Consequently, the rejection of all compassionate appointments by the DLC/SLC, which have been put to challenge and are pending in the Gauhati High Court as on 03.04.2025, are set aside.

(ii) The entire process for considering the various applications for compassionate appointment and the decision to be taken in each case by the concerned authorities, should be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by the concerned District Page No.# 4/5

Commissioner, who is also the Chairman of the DLC, if the matter pertains to the DLC. In other cases, the Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, who is the Chairman of the SLC, if the matter pertains the SLC.

10. It is made clear that in view of the consent of the parties, this Court has not gone into the merits of any of the petitioners' cases that are being disposed of by way of this order and as such, the applications for compassionate appointment should be disposed of by the concerned authorities on merit, as they deem it fit and proper. The decision/s to be taken by the concerned authorities should be based on reasons and the decision taken should be communicated to the petitioners thereafter. It is also directed that while deciding the applications for compassionate appointment, the respondents cannot take recourse to the impugned OM dated 18.09.2024, though the judgment provided therein, i.e., the case of Debabrata Tiwari (supra), can be considered/applied by the concerned authorities. It is again made clear that this order cannot be used as a precedent for cases that are filed on 04.04.2025 and thereafter. It shall only apply to cases that are pending before this Court as on 03.04.2025.

11. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of."

6. Ms. S. Konwar, learned Government Advocate, submits that as the case of the petitioner has already been recommended by the DLC, Karimganj in its meeting held on 30.11.2025 and in view of the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C)/342/2025 and a batch of writ petitions, the case of the petitioner can now be considered by the SLC.

7. Accordingly, recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is disposed of directing the SLC to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law and also on the basis of the recommendation made by the DLC, Karimganj on 30.11.2023 in its next immediate sitting.

8. However if the case of the petitioner has already been considered, the Page No.# 5/5

outcome of such consideration shall also be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

9. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter