Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 357 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 May, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010009772024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./4/2024
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF
SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR , KAMRUP M ASSAM 781006
2: THE DIRECTOR
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI- 78101
VERSUS
AJITA NATH AND 6 ORS
D/O- RAJIB NATH, R/O- VILL- HALGHAT, P.O AND P.S- NILAMBAZAR, DIST-
KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN- 788722
2:RAJAUL KARIM
S/O- ABDUL HAQUE
R/O- VILL- NIAMATAKHANI
P.O- MULLAGANJ BAZAR
DIST- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788179
3:SAFATUN NESSA
D/O- LATEABDUL WAHAB BARBHUIY
R/O- VILL- BHABANIPUR
P.O- AMALA
DIST- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN- 788164
4:TAPAZUL ALI
S/O- HAJI TAYAB ALI BARBHUIYA
Page No.# 2/3
R/O- VILL- MAZUMDER BAZAR
P.O- TARAPUR PT VII
DIST- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788003
5:MASHUK AHMED MAZUMDER
S/O- MAKRAM ALI MAZUMDER
R/O- VILL- HAILAKANDI TOWN
WARD NO. 4
P.O- HAILAKANDI
DIST- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN- 788151
6:ABDUL AZIM BARBHUIYA
S/O- MONIR ALI BARBHUIYA
R/O- VILL BORBOND PART III
P.O- BALIURA
DIST- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN- 788155
7:H M FAKRUL ALAM LASKAR @ HM FAKRUL BARBHUIYA
S/O- ABDUL WAHAB LASKAR
R/O- VILL BASBARI -I
P.O- BASBARI
DIST- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN- 78815
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M T CHISTIE, MR. R MAZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
08.05.2025 Heard Shri R Mazumdar, learned Standing Counsel Education Department, Assam appearing for the applicants who has filed this application for review of the order dated 21.12.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C)/2486/2020.
Page No.# 3/3
The matter was adjourned to enable the learned counsel for the applicants to obtain instructions on the ground on which the review has been sought for.
Shri Mazumdar, learned counsel has submitted that though vide the impugned judgment, which was passed in a bunch of writ petitions, the case of the petitioners were directed to be considered, so far as the present writ petition is concerned, the same pertains to a recruitment process which was initiated vide an advertisement dated 23.01.2020 and in the said process, the upper age limit was stated to be 38 years without any further conditions and the notifications which were mentioned in the judgment dated 02.09.2020 and 20.02.2021 were not even existing and therefore, could not have any bearing so far as the present writ petitioner is concerned. However, by the impugned judgment, respondents/writ petitioners are trying to get undue benefit on the strength of the said judgment.
Issue notice, returnable by 6 weeks.
Let steps be taken for service of notice upon the respondents by registered post with A/D.
Steps within 2 working days.
List this case after 6 weeks along with service report.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!