Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5715 Gua
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010102062025
2025:GAU-AS:8611
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1578/2025
BIBHAS ROY CHOUDHURY AND ORS
S/O LATE BINOD BIHAR TALUKDAR
2: SHRI BIJIT ROY CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR
3: SMTI NILIMA ROY CHOUDHURY
D/O LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR
4: SMTI GOPA ROY CHOUDHURY
D/O LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR
5: SMTI JOYA ROY CHOUDHURY
DAUGHTER IN LAW OF LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR W/O LATE
BIRENDRA ROY CHOUDHURY
6: JAYADRATH ROY CHOUDHURY
GRAND SON OF LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR S/O LATE BIRENDRA
ROY CHOUDHURY
7: SANJUKTA ROY CHOUDHURY
GRAND D/O LATE BINODE BIHARI TALUKDAR
D/OLATE BIRENDRA ROY CHOUDHURY
ALL ARE THE R/O THANA ROAD
KARIMGANJ TOWN
P.O.
P.S. and DIST. KARIMGANJ
PIN
Page No.# 2/3
VERSUS
DEBABRATA CHOUDHURY AND ORS
S/O LATE KAMINI KUMAR CHOUDHURY, R/O DREAMLAND APARTMENT,
ADABARI, GUWAHATI 781014, DIST. KAMRUPM, ASSAM.
2:SMTI MALA CHOUDHURY
W/O LATE BHASKAR CHOUDHURY
3:SRI BARUN CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE BHASKAR CHOUDHURY
4:SMTI BARNALI CHOUDHURY
D/O LATE BHASKAR CHOUDHURY
ALL ARE R/O HOUSE NO. 25
HILL SIDE COLONY
GATE NO. 1
P.O. MALIGAON
GUWAHATI 781011
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
For the Applicant(s) : Ms. S. Dasgupta, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : None appears.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 25.06.2025
Heard Ms. S. Dasgupta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants.
2. The present application has been filed seeking an amendment to the decree drawn up in terms with the judgment and order dated 25.04.2024 passed in RSA No.300/2014.
Page No.# 3/3
3. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that taking into account that this Court had held that the counter claim having been withdrawn with liberty would not amount to abandoning the claim subject to permissibility in filing an independent suit in accordance with law, the said observation should be incorporated in the decree. In the opinion of this Court, the said aspect so mentioned in Paragraph No.43 is an observation dealing with the additional substantial question of law No.2 framed on 02.04.2024. The said in the opinion of this Court is not required to be mentioned in the decree.
4. Accordingly, this Court finds no reasons to pass any orders in the instant application for which the instant application stands rejected.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!