Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Union Of India And 9 Ors vs Santosh Kumar
2025 Latest Caselaw 9116 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9116 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2025

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

The Union Of India And 9 Ors vs Santosh Kumar on 8 December, 2025

                                                                  Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010204882025




                                                           undefined

                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3073/2025

         1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 9 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. , MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI,
         PIN 110001

         2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
          CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD
          NEW DELHI PIN 110003

         3: THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL (CR AND VIG)
          OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL
          CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD
          NEW DELHI PIN 110003

         4: THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
          NORTH EASTERN SECTOR CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          SHILLONG MEGHALAYA PIN 793001

         5: THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
          OPERATION SECTOR CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          POLICE COMPLEX ROWRIAH JORHAT ASSAM PIN 785004

         6: BHARAT KUMAR VAISHNAV (IRLAA 4858)
          COMMANDANT 142 BATTALION
          CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          C/O OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL
          CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
          BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI PIN 110003

         7: L. KIPGEN
          (IRLA 70450)
          DEPUTY COMMANDANT GROUUP CENTRE KHATKHATI
          CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE C/O OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE
                                                                             Page No.# 2/3

             GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE BLOCK NO. 1 CGO
             COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110003

             8: SUNIL KR. SHAHI
              SECOND IN COMMAND (IRLA 5884) 26 BATTALION
              CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE C/O OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE
             GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
              BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110003

             9: RADHE SHYAM SINGH
              COMMANDANT (IRL 4692) COMMANDANT 94 BATTALION CENTRAL
             RESERVE POLICE FORCE C/O OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL
             CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI
             ROAD NEW DELHI PIN 110003

             10: MAHESH VISHWAKARMA
              SECOND IN COMMAND (IRLA 6538) 112 BATTALION
              CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE C/O OFFICE OF THE DG CRPF
              BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 11000

             VERSUS

             SANTOSH KUMAR
             ASSTT. COMMANDANT, (PS) (IRLA NO. 11192) (UNDER SUSPENSION),
             PRESENTLY POSTED AT OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL,
             (OPERATION), JORHAT, ASSAM, HEADQUARTERS DURING SUSPENSION
             AT GROUP CENTRE KHATKHATI, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE,
             KHATKHATI, KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN 782480

For the Applicant(s)   :    Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. H. Gupta,
                           Central Government Counsel.
For the Respondent(s) :      Mr. D. Gogoi, Advocate.

-B E F O R E -

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

08.12.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)

This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants/appellants seeking condonation of delay of 153 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment dated 06.03.2025 Page No.# 3/3

passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.350/2023 and other analogous cases.

We have heard Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned Advocate for the applicants/appellants and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Advocate for the sole respondent.

There is no effective resistance from the respondent with respect to the prayer for condonation of delay.

After having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicants/appellants for condoning the delay of 153 days in preferring the connected appeal.

We, therefore, condone the delay.

The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

The Registry to process the appeal and list the same on 09.02.2026 under the appropriate heading.

              JUDGE                          CHIEF JUSTICE




Comparing Assistant
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter