Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8476 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010137172024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2169/2024
MADHURI GOSWAMI SARMA AND 3 ORS
W/O JITU SARMA,
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 7, RUPALI PATH, R.G BORUAH ROAD GUWAHATI
24, MOUZA BELTOLA, PS GEETANAGAR, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM
2: AMAN ULLA
S/O ANJUMAN MAJID
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 11
MILAN NAGAR PATH
BHETAPARA
GUWAHATI 28
MOUZA BELTOLA
PS HATIGAON
DIST KAMRUPM ASSAM
3: JOYNAL ABDIN
S/O FARZ ALI
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 28
BISHNUJYOTI PATH
HATIGAON
GUWAHATI 38
MOUZA BELTOLA
PS HATIGAON
DIST KAMRUPM ASSAM
4: MD. RAHUL ALI
S/O MAHAMMAD HUSSAIN ALI
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 149
SIJUBARI MAIN ROAD
HATIGAON
GUWAHATI 38
MOUZA BELTOLA
Page No.# 2/4
PS HATIGAON
DIST KAMRUPM ASSA
VERSUS
ALAKA DUTTA
W/O MR. BIREN DUTTA,
RESIDENT OF SAWKUCHI, HOCKEY STADIUM ROAD, GUWAHATI 40, DIST
KAMRUP M ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J U AHMED, MS J YESMIN,MR. J AHMED,MR Z RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : MS D DUTTA, MR. M DUTTA,MR. B KONWAR
Linked Case :
MADHURI GOSWAMI SARMA AND 3 ORS
VERSUS
ALAKA DUTTA B
------------
Advocate for : MR J U AHMED
Advocate for : appearing for ALAKA DUTTA B
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
ORDER
Date : 20.11.2024
Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants.
Page No.# 3/4
None appears for the respondent on call
The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 9 days in preferring the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and decree dated 06.03.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) No. 1, Kamrup(M), Guwahati in Title Suit No. 690/2022.
Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the delay occurred in filing the connected appeal is not intentional. He further submits that due to fault of the engaged counsel, the delay was occurred and the detailed ground of delay has also been explained in the petition. Under such backdrop, the learned counsel for the applicants has prayed that the delay in regard to the filling of the connected appeal may be condoned.
Although the respondent is not present today but he has filed an objection regarding the prayer of the applicants, wherein it is stated that the present application is not maintainable because the applicants has failed to mention any compelling reason for condonation of such delay.
I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties.
It appears that the delay occurred due to fault of the engaged counsel of the applicants. It is a settled law that the litigants cannot be suffered or victimized due to fault of the counsel.
Considering all, the delay of 09 days is hereby condoned. The Registry is Page No.# 4/4
directed to register the connected appeal and list it in admission column.
With the above observation, I/A stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!