Gauhati High Court
Chiranjib Bhattacharjee vs The Assam Power Generation Corp Ltd And 5 ... on 3 May, 2024
Author: Soumitra Saikia
Bench: Soumitra Saikia
Page No.# 1/5
GAHC010083902024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2246/2024
CHIRANJIB BHATTACHARJEE
S/O- LATE CHAKRADHAR BHATTACHARJEE,
R/O- E-5 PURBASHA APARTMENT, ULUBARI, P.O- ULUBARI, GUWAHATI,
DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN-781007
VERSUS
THE ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORP LTD AND 5 ORS
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN , HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BIJULEE
BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-01
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
THE ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTANBAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LIMITED
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
4:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR)
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
5:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR)
Page No.# 2/5
O/O THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (GEN)
ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD.
6:THE CONTROLLER OF MOVEMENT APGCL
KANCHANA (1ST FLOOR)
7/1
KANCHANA (1ST FLOOR)
7/1 RUSSEL STREET
KOLKATA-7
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S MUKTAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SR. SC, APGCL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
03.05.2024
Heard Mr. S. Muktar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.
H.R. Das, learned Standing Counsel, APGCL, Mr. S.P. Sharma, learned Standing
Counsel, APDCL and Mr. S. Kotoky, learned Standing Counsel, AEGCL.
2] The issue involved in this case is identical since this Court has been informed
that to that which has been decided by this Court in an earlier case, namely,
WP(C) No.1607/2020 vide Judgment and Order dated 03.11.2022, this case is
taken up for disposal at the Motion stage itself.
3] The learned counsel for the respondents submit that although the issue is
covered by the judgment and Order dated 03.11.2022 in WP(C) No.1607/2022
Page No.# 3/5
but against the said Judgment and Order an appeal has been preferred before
the Division Bench in W.A. No.107/2023 and the issue is presently subjudiced
before the Appellate. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents further submits that in the said appeal, although the Judgment and
Order dated 03.11.2022 passed in WP(C) no.1607/2020 has not been stayed,
however, it was observed that the respondents in the writ appeal/petitioner in
WP(C) No.1607/2020 shall give an undertaking to the effect that in case the
appeal is allowed, the respondents therein shall reimburse the excess amount, if
any, paid to them on account of the Judgment and Order dated 03.11.2022.
4] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is also
willing to give a similar undertaking to that effect.
5] Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into
consideration that the issue involved in the instant writ petition, is squarely
covered by the judgment and order dated 03.11.2022 passed in WP(C)
no.1607/2022, this Court disposes of the instant writ petition observing that as
the petitioner herein having attained the age of superannuation on 31.03.2016,
he acquires the status of the pensioner only on and from 01.04.2016. Under
such circumstances, the entitlement of the petitioner has to be worked out in
terms with the provisions laid down under Rule 4 (a) of the Revised Pay Rules,
Page No.# 4/5
2017.
6] Accordingly, this Court directs the respondent authorities to work out the
entitlement of the petitioner as a pensioner under different Heads like Pension,
Commuted Value of Pension (CVP), Death-cum-Retirement Benefit, Leave
Encashment Benefits etc. on the basis of Rule 4 (a) of the Revised Pay Rules,
2017 and if after such exercise the petitioner is found entitled for an enhanced
amount than that what has been worked out in the Office Order
No.MD/APGCL/PEN/M-15/176/36 dated 18.04.2016 at the time of his
retirement, the same should be disbursed to the petitioner in an expeditious
manner and in terms of the decision taken in the Joint Committee of Chairman
(JCC) Meeting Held on 27.02.2024.
7] It is further directed that the said exercise be undertaken and completed
within a period 2 (two) months from the date of submission of a certified copy
of this order by the petitioner at the office of the respondent no.2.
8] Before parting with the record, this Court further deems it proper to observe
and direct that the petitioner shall submit, along with the certified copy of the
instant order, an undertaking to the effect that in case W.A. No.107/2023 is
decided in favour of the appellants therein, he shall reimburse the excess
amount paid to him on account of the order passed therein.
Page No.# 5/5
9] With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
