Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5897 Gua
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010157682024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4063/2024
ATUL BASUMATARY
S/O- LATE BIPUN BASUMATARY, R/O- VILL.- MURMELA-NH-31, P.O.
MURMELA, P.S. BARAMA, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVT.OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORK (ROADS) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
3:THE JOINT SECRETARY
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
4:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
5:THE DIRECTOR CUM-CHD
PWD
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
PWD (R AND B) CIRCLE B.T.C.
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD
MUSHALPUR (R AND B) DIVISION
MUSHALPUR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS A BUJARBARUAH, MS A.SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, BTC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
14.08.2024
1. Heard Ms. A. Bujarbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner had filed WP(C) 3997/2020 for non-payment of contractual dues. This Court, vide order dated 08.04.2021 disposed of WP(C) 3997/2020, with a direction to the respondent authorities to verify the claim of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment of this Court in Tamsher Ali vs. State of Assam & Others, reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1.
2. As the respondent authorities did not comply with the order passed in WP(C) 3997/2020, the petitioner filed Contempt Case(C) 13/2022. The contempt case was disposed of vide order dated 01.03.2024, in view of Mr. P. Nayak, learned counsel for the respondent having submitted that the name of the petitioner had been included in the list for payment of contractual bills, in terms of the judgment in Tamsher Ali (supra).
Page No.# 3/3
3. The counsel for the respondent in the contempt case had also submitted that as the petitioner's name had been included in the list of persons, who were verified for payment of their unpaid contractual dues, the same would be paid to the petitioner.
4. The petitioner's counsel submits that despite a lapse of more than 5 (five) months, no payment has been made to the petitioner till date.
5. Issue Notice returnable in 3 (three) weeks.
6. Ms. R.B. Borah, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 7, while Mr. P. Nayak, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no.1.
7. In terms of letter No. BTC/F(Court Case)/103/2022/163 dated 09.08.2024 issued by the Secretary, BTC Kokrajhar, the BTC has received Rs.40150 lakhs from the Government of Assam, as 50% of the SOPD funds for budget allocation to BTC for the financial year 2024-25, as first instalment.
8. Keeping the above in view, Ms. R.B. Borah shall obtain instructions as to why the petitioner's contractual dues has not been cleared till date.
9. List the matter on 10.09.2024.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!