Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2234 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2023
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010114112023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1464/2023
PURNA KANTA DUTTA AND 7 ORS.
S/O. HEM CHANDRA DUTTA, VILL. DUBIAPATHAR, P.O. DUBIA, DIST.
BISWANATH, PIN 784178
2: BIMAL KRISHNA PAUL
S/O. GOPAL CHANDRA PAUL
WARD NO.3
UDALGURI
P.O. AND DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
3: SURENDRA SAIKIA
S/O. LT. HIRESWAR SAIKIA
VILL. AND P.O. KAMDEWAL
DIST. BISWANATH
4: KRISHNA MOHAN CHETRI
S/O. CHANDRA MOHAN CHETRY
VILL. GOKAGAON
P.O. UDALGURI
DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
5: KHAGENDRA NATH SARMA
S/O. LT. KANAK SARMA
WARD NO.3
UDALGURI
P.O. AND DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
6: BUDHIN BARUAH
Page No.# 2/6
S/O. LT. GOLAP CHANDRA BARUAH
VILL. AMLAKHIDALANI
P.O. HALEM
DIST. BISWANATH
ASSAM
7: BIPIN CHANDRA GAGOI
S/O. LT. NILESWAR GAGOI
VILL. AIDEOBARI BAGICHA
P.O. BENGENABARI
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
8: SARBANANDA NATH
S/O. LT. ADIRAM NATH
VILL. BARPHUKHURIPAR
P.O. HALESWAR
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT.
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY.-06.
4:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.
JURIPAR
JUNJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
Page No.# 3/6
ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX
GUWAHATI-06.
6:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GHY.-29.
7:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SONITPUR ZILLA PARISHAD
AT TEZPUR
P.O. TEZPUR
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
8:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SIVASAGAR ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Linked Case : WP(C)/4996/2018
PURNA KANTA DUTTA AND 7 ORS.
S/O. HEM CHANDRA DUTTA
VILL. DUBIAPATHAR
P.O. DUBIA
DIST. BISWANATH
2: BIMAL KRISHNA PAUL
S/O. GOPAL CHANDRA PAUL
WARD NO.3
UDALGURI
P.O. AND DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
Page No.# 4/6
3: SURENDRA SAIKIA
S/O. LT. HIRESWAR SAIKIA
VILL. AND P.O. KAMDEWAL
DIST. BISWANATH
4: KRISHNA MOHAN CHETRI
S/O. CHANDRA MOHAN CHETRY
VILL. GOKAGAON
P.O. UDALGURI
DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
5: KHAGENDRA NATH SARMA
S/O. LT. KANAK SARMA
WARD NO.3
UDALGURI
P.O. AND DIST. UDALGURI (BTAD)
ASSAM
6: BUDHIN BARUAH
S/O. LT. GOLAP CHANDRA BARUAH
VILL. AMLAKHIDALANI
P.O. HALEM
DIST. BISWANATH
ASSAM
7: BIPIN CHANDRA GAGOI
S/O. LT. NILESWAR GAGOI
VILL. AIDEOBARI BAGICHA
P.O. BENGENABARI
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
8: SARBANANDA NATH
S/O. LT. ADIRAM NATH
VILL. BARPHUKHURIPAR
P.O. HALESWAR
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
Page No.# 5/6
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY.-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT.
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY.-06.
4:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.
JURIPAR
JUNJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX
GUWAHATI-06.
6:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GHY.-29.
7:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SONITPUR ZILLA PARISHAD
AT TEZPUR
P.O. TEZPUR
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
8:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SIVASAGAR ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. M DUTTA
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
Page No.# 6/6
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 29.05.2023
Heard Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. P. Handique, learned Govt. Advocate and Mr. D. Rabha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.6.
This interlocutory application has been filed for allowing the petitioner no.4 in WP(C)/4996/2018 to correct his name to Sri Krishna Mohan Chetry, which is wrongly shown as Krisnha Mohan Chetry and to correct his retirement dated to 31.01.2017, which is wrongly shown as 21.04.1993.
It is submitted that the mistake was a typographical error.
It may be mentioned that as the connected writ petition has already been heard and reserved for judgment, the formal correction of the writ petition can only be done when the matter is released.
Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed to the extent as indicated above.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!