Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2231 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010254492022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./216/2023
MOINA DAS
S/O SHRI DIMBESWAR DAS, R/O VILL.-JAMUNA CHARIALI, SIVASAGAR
TOWN, WARD NO. 2,P.O. AND P.S.- SIVASAGAR, DIST.- SIVASAGAR
(ASSAM), PIN-785640.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REP. BY P.P., ASSAM
2:SMT. JONAKI DAS
W/O LATE RAJU DAS
3:SHRI SHEKHAR DAS
S/O LATE RAJU DAS
BOTH OF THEM ARE R/O VILL.- JAMUNA ROAD (JAMUNA CHARIALI)
SIVASAGAR TOWN
WARD NO. 2
DIST.- SIVASAGAR (ASSAM)
PIN- 785640
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D C K HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
29.05.2023 Heard Mr. D.C.K. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. S.H. Borah, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent No.1.
2. This criminal petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 05.08.2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 40(4)/2019 by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Sivasagar, which was preferred by the present petitioner against the order of conviction passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivasagar vide Judgment and Order dated 21.09.2019 passed in PRC No. 90/2018.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a mere proposal of the impugned order reveals that the criminal appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution. It is submitted that once the appeal is not dismissed summarily under Section 384 Cr.P.C. then there is a procedure laid down under Section 385 Cr.P.C and the appeal will have to heard on merits and cannot dismissed summarily as has been done by the Court of Sessions. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also referred to the Judgment of the Apex Court rendered in Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai Vs. State of Bihar (Criminal Appeal No. 803/2017).
4. Accordingly, let Notice be issued, Returnable after three weeks.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents have already been represented in an Interlocutory Application being I.A.(Crl.) No. 802/2022 which was filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of the delay that had occurred.
6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Page No.# 3/3
the learned counsel is permitted to take steps on the respondents by serving copies of this petition on the counsels who are stated to have appeared for representing the respondents.
7. List again on 09.06.2023 on which date an attempt to be made to dispose of the criminal petition.
8. Till the next date, the impugned order dated 05.08.2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 40(4)/2019 shall remain suspended.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!