Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1878 Gua
Judgement Date : 10 May, 2023
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010082712023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/69/2023
ON THE DEATH OF TAYAB ALI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS MOHAMMAD ALI
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA, MAUZA NAOBAICHA, PS UTTAR
LAKHIMPUR, DIST LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
2: JOMILA KHATUN
D/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
3: JUBEDA KHATUN
D/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
4: AHAMMAD ALI
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
5: AMIR HUSSAIN
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
Page No.# 2/6
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
6: HANIF ALI
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
7: AYESHA KHATUN
D/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
8: JUSHNARA BEGUM
D/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
9: MOHIDUL ISLAM
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
10: HEDATUL ISLAM
S/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
11: TOSLIMA BEGUM
D/O LATE TAYAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
Page No.# 3/6
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
VERSUS
TOMIR ALI AND 12 ORS.
S/O LATE JAHUR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA, MAUZA NAOBAICHA, PS
UTTAR LAKHIMPUR, DIST LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
2:MD. SAMIR ALI
S/O LATE JAHUR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
3:MD. IMAN ALI
S/O LATE JAHUR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
4:MD. NUR AMIN
S/O LATE SAMAR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
5:MD. HASMOT ALI
S/O LATE TOMIR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
6:AKKEL ALI
S/O LATE TOMIR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
Page No.# 4/6
ASSAM
7:MD. ANAR ALI
S/O LATE TOMIR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
8:MD. RAMJAN ALI
S/O MD. NUR AMIN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
9:MD. ISMAIL ALI
S/O LATE NAYEB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
10:MD. MANNAS ALI
S/O LATE NAYED ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
11:MD. MOFIZUDDIN
S/O LATE NAYED ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
12:MD. FAIZUDDIN
S/O LATE NAYEB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
Page No.# 5/6
ASSAM
13:MD. SIDDIK ALI
S/O LATE ASOR UDDIN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BARCHOLA
MAUZA NAOBAICHA
PS UTTAR LAKHIMPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
10.05.2023
Heard Mr. A.I.Uddin, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The appeal is admitted for hearing upon the following four substantial questions of law:-
(i) As to whether the learned Appellate Court was justified in dismissing the appeal and in affirming the Judgment and Decree of the learned trial Court on the ground of limitation in absence of any issue thereof?
(ii) As to whether both the Courts below were right in dismissing the suit of the plaintiff ignoring the fact that the learned Executive Magistrate in Misc Case No. 305/1983 under Section 145 Cr.P.C. initiated by the defendants' side confirmed the possession of the plaintiff over the schedule land vide order dated 11-02-1987 meaning thereby the plaintiff was all along in exclusive possession of Page No.# 6/6
the suit land till his dispossession from the suit land on 21-11-2012?
(iii) As to whether the Courts below are justified in not considering that the issue relating to dispossession of the plaintiff has been admitted by the principal defendants and as per the principles of doctrine of reverse burden it is the duty of the respondents/principal defendants to prove that the assertion to the plaintiff is unsustainable?
(iv) As to whether in absence of any specific plea of adverse possession can court pass decree to that effect?
Issue notice to the respondents.
The appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by registered post with A/D and other usual process.
Call for the LCR.
List this matter after 4(four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!