Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1479 Gua
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010023342023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/408/2023
DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG AND 3 ORS.
S/O LATE BASANTA HAJONG, R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI),
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO, DIST-KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN-781123
2: AMRIT HAJONG
S/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781123
3: SMTI. RAJESWARI HAJONG
D/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781123
4: SMTI. BAJAYANTYI HAJONG
D/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-78112
VERSUS
KHAGEN HAJONG
S/O LATE CHANDRA HAJONG, R/O BONDA COLONY, NARENGI, P.S.-
PRAGJYOTISHPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M), PIN-781026, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/4
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. J AHMED
Linked Case :
DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG AND 3 ORS.
S/O- LATE BASANTA HAJONG
2: AMRIT HAJONG
S/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
3: RAJESWARI HAJONG
D/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
4: BAJAYANTYI HAJONG
D/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PAKHARAPARA ( HAJONG BASTI)
P.O AND P.S BOKO
DIST- KAMRUP (R)
PIN-781123
ASSAM
VERSUS
KHAGEN HAJONG
S/O- LATE CHANDRA HAJONG
R/O- BONDA COLONY NARENGI
P.S- PRAGJYOTISHPUR
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
PIN-781026
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. R BARUAH
Advocate for : appearing for KHAGEN HAJONG
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
11.04.2023.
Heard Mr. I. Iqbal, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard learned counsel for the respondents.
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 107 days in preferring the connected civil revision petition against the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2022 passed by the learned Special Tribunal (Additional District & Sessions Judge), Kamrup (R) at Amingaon in Land Grabbing Case No. 10/2016. The cause of delay is explained at paragraphs- 4, 5 and 6 of the connected application.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents that she will have no objection, if delay is condoned.
Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the pleadings made in the paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the connected application, this Court is of the opinion that the present applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time.
Accordingly, the delay is condoned.
IA stands disposed of.
Registry to register the connected civil revision petition, if same is not defective and list for Admission.
Page No.# 4/4
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!