Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs Md. Anis Ahmed Laskar And 9 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 3927 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3927 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs Md. Anis Ahmed Laskar And 9 Ors on 29 September, 2022
                                                                 Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010168602019




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2911/2019

         ON THE DEATH OF JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR, HIS LEGAL HEIRS MUSSTT
         AYESHA SULTANA LASKAR AND 5 ORS
         W/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR.

         2: MUSSTT. NILUFA YEASMIN BARBHUIYA
          D/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR.

         3: MUSSTT. LOTIFA YEASMIN BARBHUIYA
          D/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR.

         4: MUSSTT. SAHIMA YEASMIN BARBHUIYA
          D/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR.

         5: MUSSTT. SHAMIMA YEASMIN BARBHUIYA
          D/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR.

         6: MUSSTT. SULTANA ARMIN JAMAN MAZUMDAR
          D/O- LATE JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR
         ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF RATANPUR ROAD
         WARD NO. 11
          HAILAKANDI TOWN
          P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
         ASSAM

         VERSUS

         MD. ANIS AHMED LASKAR AND 9 ORS.
         S/O- LATE SAFI AHMED LASKAR, WARD NO. 12, HAILAKANDI TOWN, P.S.
         AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM.

         2:MD. JAHANGIR HUSSAIN LASKAR
          S/O- LATE SAMS UDDIN LASKAR
         VILL.- CHIPARSANGAN PT-III
          P.S. ALGAPUR
                                       Page No.# 2/4

DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.

3:MUSSTT. JOBAFUL NESSA BIBI
 D/O- LATE AYUB ALI
W/O- LATE MOBARAK ALI BARBHUIYA
 C/O- AYNUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA
VILL.- NARAINPUR
 P.O. BIDYARATANPUR
 P.S. DHOLAI
 DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.

4:MUSSTT. RAHIMA KHATUN BARBHUIYA
W/O- LATE JAMIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA
 R/O- VILL.- BISHNUGOR
 P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.

5:MD. ATIQUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA
 S/O- LATE JAMIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA
 R/O- VILL.- BISHNUGOR
 P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.

6:MD. SAMSUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA
 S/O- HABIBUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA
 R/O- VILL.- BISHNUGOR
 P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.

7:MD. ISLAM UDDIN BARBHUIYA
 S/O- HABIBUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA
 R/O- VILL.- BISHNUGOR
 P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.

8:MUSSTT. HUSNA BEGUM LASKARM
W/O- LATE SAMSUDDIN LASKAR
 R/O- VILL.- CHIPOR SANGON PART-III
 P.S. ALGAPUR
 DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.

9:MUSSTT. BEGUM FERDOUSI LASKAR
 D/O- LATE SAMSUDDIN LASKAR
 R/O- VILL.- CHIPOR SANGON PART-III
 P.S. ALGAPUR
                                                                            Page No.# 3/4

             DIST.- CACHAR
             ASSAM.

            10:MUSSTT. BEGUM USMIN SULTANA LASKAR
             D/O- LATE SAMSUDDIN LASKAR
             R/O- VILL.- CHIPOR SANGON PART-III
             P.S. ALGAPUR
             DIST.- CACHAR
            ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. D CHAKRABARTY

Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R CHOUDHURY (r-1,2,8,9,10)

             Linked Case :

            ON THE DEATH OF JASIM UDDIN MAZUMDAR
            HIS LEGAL HEIRS MUSSTT AYESHA SULTANA LASKAR AND 5 ORS



             VERSUS

            MD. ANIS AHMED LASKAR AND 9 ORS



            ------------

Advocate for :

Advocate for : appearing for MD. ANIS AHMED LASKAR AND 9 ORS

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

29.09.2022

Heard Mr. N. Das, the leanred counsel for the applicant and Ms. R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Rs. Nos.1, 2, 8, 9 &

10.

Taking into account that the respondent No.3 herein is a proforma Page No.# 4/4

respondent and the proforma defendant in the suit, the presence of the respondent No.3 is not necessary for effective adjudication of the instant proceedings.

This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 254 days in preferring the regular second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2018 and 08.08.2018 respectively, passed in Title Appeal No.3/2018

The reasons assigned in the said application have been mentioned in paragraph No.2 of the instant application.

I have perused the said paragraph and upon perusal thereof, this Court is of the opinion that the same constitutes a sufficient cause within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Accordingly, the delay of 254 days is condoned.

The Registry is directed to register the regular second appeal and list it in the Column of Order XLI Rule 11 immediately after the Puja Vacation.

The I.A stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter