Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Arati Saikia @ Arati Bordoloi ... vs Sri Monuj Kr Borah And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 3648 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3648 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Smt Arati Saikia @ Arati Bordoloi ... vs Sri Monuj Kr Borah And Anr on 19 September, 2022
                                                                           Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010149442018




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : MACApp./607/2022

             SMT ARATI SAIKIA @ ARATI BORDOLOI SAIKIA
             W/O- LATE BIPUL SAIKIA, R/O- VILL.- DOLOICHUBA, P.O. DOLOICHUBA,
             P.S. AND DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782105



             VERSUS

             SRI MONUJ KR BORAH AND ANR
             S/O- SRI SUREN BORAH, R/O- VILL.- AMSOI, P.O. AMSOI, P.S. RAHA, DIST.-
             NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782425

             2:NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

             REP. BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER
             GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE
             G.S. ROAD
             BHANGAGARH
             GUWAHATI-5

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M TALUKDAR

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K BHATTA



                                       BEFORE
                    HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
                                         ORDER

19.09.2022 Heard Mr M Talukdar, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms L Sharma, learned Page No.# 2/2

counsel for the respondent No. 2.

This appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the claimant/appellant against the Judgment and Order dated 19.05.2017, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Morigaon, in MAC Case No. 56/2014. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent No. 1 is the owner of the alleged offending vehicle and as such, his presence is not necessary as he has preferred the appeal on the point of quantum of compensation and prayed to struck off the name of respondent No. 1 from the array of respondents. Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the Registry is directed to strike out the name of respondent No. 1 from the array of respondents in the Cause Title. Call for the LCR.

List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter