Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilip Kumar Deb vs Subrata Dasgupta
2022 Latest Caselaw 312 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 312 Gua
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Dilip Kumar Deb vs Subrata Dasgupta on 31 January, 2022
                                                                        Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010149392021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
     (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                   Case No. : CRP/52/2021

            DILIP KUMAR DEB
            S/O- LATE DHIRENDRA KUMAR DEB, R/O- SHYAMAPRASAD ROAD
            (SHILLONGPATTY), SILCHAR TOWN, P..S SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR,
            ASSAM, PIN- 788001.



            VERSUS

            SUBRATA DASGUPTA
            S/O- LATE CHITTA RANJAN DAS GUPTA, R/O- PREMTOLS, SILCHAR TOWN,
            P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001.



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S K GHOSH

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA




                                      BEFORE
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

                                          ORDER

Date : 31.01.2022.

Heard Mr. S.K. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.D. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Page No.# 2/4

whereby the judgment and order dated 26.08.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge No.2, Cachar, Silchar in Misc. Appeal No. 05/2021 is put to challenge.

3 The factual matrix giving rise in filing this revision petition lies within a very short campus.

4. The petitioner is a tenant under the respondent and the suit has been filed against him for his ejectment on certain grounds. During the pendency of the suit, the electricity connection to the rented premises was discontinued by the respondent/landlord. The petitioner approached the learned trial court, but the trial court issued notice only. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal before the court of the learned Civil Judge No.2 at Cachar, Silchar, which was also dismissed.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides.

6. At this stage Section 6 of the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972 is relevant. Section 6 as under:-

Duties of landlord.- Every landlord shall be bound to keep wind-proof and water-proof any house which is in occupation of a tenant and to carry out other repairs which he is bound to make by law, contract or custom and also to maintain the existing essential supplies and services such as sanitary arrangement, water supply, supply of electricity or drainage service in respect of the house.

Explanation.- "Repair" includes annual whitewashing and recolouring.

7. Now Section 7 of the Act of 1972 is quoted as under:-

Notice on landlord to perform duties.-(1) if the landlord neglects to make such repairs or to maintain such existing essential supplies and services he is bound to do under the provisions of Section 6, the Court may, on the application of the tenant, direct the landlord by notice to appear before, it and to show cause against the Page No.# 3/4

application of the tenant.

(2) If the landlord fails to show sufficient cause, the Court may direct him to make such repairs or as the case may be, to take such measures for the restoration of the essential supplies and services as contemplated in Section 6 within a period fixed by the Court.

(3) If the landlord fails to show sufficient cause, the Court may direct him to make such repairs or take such measures within the period fixed by the Court, the Court may on application of the tenant permit him to make such repairs or take such measures, as the case may be, at a cost not exceeding the amount may consider necessary; and it shall thereafter be lawful for the tenant to make such repairs or take such measures and to deduct the cost thereof from the rent or to recorder the amount from the landlord through the court by execution, and for the purpose of this sub- section the order of the Court shall be deemed to be decree under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(Central Act 5 of 1908) and to be capable of execution as such under the provisions of that Code.

8. This Court in Ramjilal Sharma v. Purushottam Lal Sharma , reported in 1983 1 GLR 342 has already held that it is the duty of the landlord to see that the essential supplies to the rented premises are not destructed and if such things happened then it will be the bounded duty of the landlord to make good of it. Section 7 of the 1972 empowers the Court to that effect.

9. The electricity supply is an essential service. Therefore, the learned trial court as well as the first appellant court should have interfered. They failed to exercise their lawful duty. For this reason, it is hereby directed that within 7 days, the respondent/landlord shall restore electricity connection to the premises of the petitioner. If the respondent/landlord fails to do so, the petitioner shall have the liberty to apply for a new electricity connection. It is further directed that if the petitioner manages Page No.# 4/4

to get a new electricity connection, this fact will have no impact in the ultimate result of the suit.

10. With the aforesaid directions, the present revision petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter