Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Debi Roy vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 543 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 543 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Debi Roy vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 16 February, 2022
                                                                    Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010020752022




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/984/2022

         DEBI ROY
         W/O LT. RANJAN KR. ROY, VILL-NO. 2 GORESWAR, P.O.-GORESWAR, P.S.-
         GORESWAR, DIST-BAKSA, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
         OF ASSAM, REVENUE (D.M.), RELIEF AND REHABILITATION
         DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6

         2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          FINANCE DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GHY-6

         3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF BAKSA DISTRICT
          MUSHALPUR
          DIST-BAKSA
         ASSAM
          PIN-781372

         4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OF BAKSA DISTRICT
          MUSHALPUR
          DIST-BAKSA
         ASSAM
          PIN-781372

         5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER OF GORESWAR REVENUE CIRCLE
          P.O. AND P.S.-GORESWAR
          DIST-BAKSA
         ASSA
                                                                                 Page No.# 2/3


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A T SARKAR

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE




                                    BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                          ORDER

16.02.2022

Heard Mr. A.T. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department/Finance Department for the respondent nos. 1 and 2; and Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate for the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5.

2. In this writ petition, it has been projected that the husband of the petitioner Late Ranjan Kumar Roy was kidnapped on 17.05.1995 and was apprehended to be killed by extremist. By an order bearing No. R.R. 70/2006/PT-III/79 dated 07.10.2010, the respondent no. 1 had disbursed an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as ex-gratia grant to the petitioner as the next of kin of Late Ranjan Kumar Roy as per the scheme prevalent at that point of time. However, subsequently, by issuing a notification dated 22.06.2004, the amount of ex-gratia grant to be paid to the next of kin of the victims who were killed in extremist violence had been enhanced to Rs. 3,00,000/-. By judgment and order dated 09.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.[C] no. 3355/2007, it was held that the family members of the victims who had earlier received Rs. 1,00,000/-, would also be entitled to the enhanced amount of ex-gratia grant in terms of the notification dated 22.06.2004. Accordingly, the petitioner has approached this Court by this writ petition seeking payment of the additional amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- as ex-gratia grant under the notification dated 22.06.2004.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that this writ petition can be disposed of at this motion stage, in the manner, the earlier similar writ petitions were Page No.# 3/3

disposed of.

4. It is noticed that the respondent no. 5 has already completed the enquiry regarding the claim made by the petitioner for payment of the enhanced amount of ex-gratia grant and has submitted an enquiry report with regard to such claim before the office of the respondent no. 3 vide letter No. G.R.C-18/2012/79 dated 30.01.2020. As per the said letter, the petitioner was the wife of Late Ranjan Kumar Roy and apart from her, Late Ranjan Kumar Roy had left behind a son, Sri Ankur Roy.

5. Having regard to the fact that the enquiry has already been undertaken by the respondent authorities, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities, more particularly, the respondent no. 1 and the respondent no. 3 to verify the claim of the petitioner and if the same are found to be genuine, necessary steps for making payment of the balance amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- be taken. The exercise as directed above, be carried out and completed as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 3 [three] months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order from the petitioner.

6. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter