Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paramita Acharjee vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 528 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 528 Gua
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Paramita Acharjee vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 15 February, 2022
                                                                    Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010021182022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                               Case No. : WP(C)/899/2022

            PARAMITA ACHARJEE
            D/O- LATE NARAYAN ACHARJEE, W/O- DR. BISHWAJIT BHATTACHARJEE,
            R/O- ROYNAGAR, WARD NO. 25, P.O AND DIST-KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-
            781711



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
            TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY HIGHER
            EDUCATION, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -6.

            2:DIRECTOR HIGHER EDUCATION
            ASSAM
             KAHILIPARA
             GUWAHATI -19.

            3:THE PRESIDENT
             GOVERNING BODY RADHA MADHAB COLLEGE
             SILCHAR
             DIST- CACHAR
             PIN-788006
            ASSAM

            4:THE PRINCIPAL CUM SECRETARY
             RADHA MADHAB COLLEGE
             SILCHAR
             DIST- CACHAR
             PIN-788006
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A DHAR
                                                                                   Page No.# 2/4

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) Date : 15-02-2022

Heard Mr. A Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S Das, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 and 2 being the authorities under the Higher Education Department, Government of Assam.

2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed, notices are not required to be issued to the respondents no. 3 and 4 being the authorities under the Radhamadhab College, Silchar.

3. An advertisement was issued in the local daily newspaper ' The Assam Tribune' dated 22.06.2014 inviting applications from the candidates having UGC norms with NET/SLET/SET/M.Phil degree on or before 10.07.2009/PhD. degree as per by UGC regulation, 2009, by the Principal cum Secretary of Radhamadhab College, Silchar for a post of Assistant Professor in Bengali (unreserved). The petitioner along with others participated in the resultant selection process.

4. The present petitioner namely Paramita Acharjee who had also offered her candidature pursuant to the said advertisement instituted WP(C)/6205/2014 inter-alia claiming that she was not called for the interview. The said writ petition was given a final consideration by the judgment dated 15.06.2018 whereby the rejection of the application of the petitioner was found to be arbitrary and accordingly, a direction was issued to the authorities to accept the application of the petitioner.

5. Another candidate in the selection process namely Abhijit Choudhury instituted WP(C)/8517/2018 on the grievance of non-consideration or non-allotment of marks in respect of certain qualifications of the said candidate. The said writ petition was given a final consideration by the order dated 19.09.2019 requiring the petitioner therein to prefer a detail representation before the Director of Higher Education, Assam. In the meantime the present Page No.# 3/4

writ petitioner instituted WP(C)/3814/2020 on the ground of there being an inordinate delay in finalizing the selection process to the advertisement dated 22.06.2014. The said writ petition was given a final consideration by the order dated 26.04.2021 directing the President of the Governing Body of Radhamadhab College, Silchar to submit its resolution regarding the selection to the unreserved post of Assistant Professor of Bengali in the College as per the advertisement dated 22.06.2014 and 26.06.2014. It was further provided that after receipt of the resolution of the Governing Body of Radhamadhab College, Silchar the Director of Higher Education, Assam within a period of sixty days shall pass necessary order under the provisions of the Assam College Employees (Provincialisation) Rules, 2010 (in short, the Rules of 2010) as well as taking note of an earlier order dated 19.09.2019 in WP(C)/8517/2018.

6. Thereafter, the authorities in the Radhamadhab College, Silchar by a communication dated 08.05.2021 informed the petitioner that pursuant to the direction in the order dated 26.04.2021 in WP(C)/3814/2020, the entire records of the selection was transmitted by the college authorities to the Director of Higher Education, Assam. As nothing further progressed, the petitioner submitted representations before the authorities and in response to one such representation, the Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Higher Education Department required the Director of Higher Education, Assam to submit a status report to the Department on the selection process. Even after such steps nothing further had progressed, some further representations were submitted by the petitioner but of no avail. Being aggrieved, the present writ petition is instituted seeking relief that the resolution of the Governing Body of the Radhamadhab College, Silchar pertaining to the selection pursuant to the advertisements dated 22.06.2014 and 26.06.2014 be given its final consideration.

7. Rule 7 of the Rules of 2010 inter-alia requires that all appointments either by direct recruitment or by promotion, shall be made by the Director on the basis of recommendations of the Governing Body based on the recommendations of the Selection Committee/Departmental Promotion Committee which were duly constituted.

8. From the communication of the College authorities dated 08.05.2021, it is discernable that the records containing the recommendation of the Governing Body based on the recommendation of the Selection Committee were duly transmitted to the Director of Higher Education, Assam for its consideration under Rule 7 of the Rules of 2010. We are of the view Page No.# 4/4

that Rule 7 of the Rules of 2010 vests a legal duty on the Director to pass a reasoned order on such recommendation being made by the Governing Body and it would be inappropriate for the Director to sit over the matter and not take any decision.

9. In the circumstance, we dispose of this writ petition directing the Director of Higher Education, Assam to consider the recommendation of the Governing Body of Radhamadhab College, Silchar based on the recommendation of the selection committee as per the advertisement dated 22.06.2014 and 26.06.2014 and pass a reasoned order thereof as required under Rule 7(a) of the Rules of 2010. The reasoned order be passed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. If the records of the recommendation of the Governing Body are not available in the office of the Director of Higher Education, Assam, the Director shall do the needful to obtain the recommendation from the authorities of Radhamadhab College, Silchar and pass a reasoned order as required by this order.

10. Writ petition stands allowed as indicated above.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter