Gouri Goswami Roy vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 1333 Gua

                                                                Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010184682018




                         THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/5739/2018

         GOURI GOSWAMI ROY
         D/O. LATE RUKMINI GOSWAMI, W/O. SRI PRADIP ROY, R/O.
         KALAHBHANGA, MOUZA- DC BAUSI, P.S. BARPETA ROAD, DISTRICT-
         BARPETA (ASSAM), PIN- 781315.


         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME
         AFFAIRS, SASTRI BHAWAN, TILOK MARG, NEW DELHI- 1.

         2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

          NEW DELHI-1.

         3:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-6.

         4:THE FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL NO. 8
          BARPETA
          DIST. BARPETA
         ASSAM
          PIN- 783301.

         5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
          BARPETA
          P.O. AND P.S. BARPETA
         ASSAM
          PIN- 781301.
                                                                        Page No.# 2/2

            6:THE STATE COORDINATOR

             ASSAM NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZEN (NRC)
             BHANGAGARH
             GUWAHATI-5.

            7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
             BARPETA
             P.O. AND P.S. BARPETA
            ASSAM
             PIN- 781301

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S SHARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

                                             BEFORE
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
                                    :: O R D E R ::

21.04.2022 [N. Kotiswar Singh, J]

Heard Mr. S. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for respondent Nos.3, 4 & 5; Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned ASGI for respondent No.1; Ms. Devi also appears for respondent No.6; Mr. A. Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, ECI for respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appears for respondent No.7.

Hearing concluded.

Judgment reserved.

                                 JUDGE                              JUDGE

Comparing Assistant