Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Promod Das vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 2209 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2209 Gua
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Promod Das vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors on 14 September, 2021
                                                               Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010139152021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/4451/2021

         PROMOD DAS
         S/O LATE PORESH DAS
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1, KOWADANGA
         PS LALUK, PO KOWADANGA,
         DIST LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 787031



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
         ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR
         GUWAHATI 781006

         2:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE

         REPRESENTED Y THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM CUM
         CHAIRMAN
         JANATA BHAWAN
         DISPUR
         GUWAHATI 781006

         3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
         TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
          JANATA BHAWAN
          DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006

         4:THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

          ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
          JANATA BHAWAN
          DISPUR
                                                                        Page No.# 2/5

             GUWAHATI 781006

            5:THE DIRECTOR
             ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM
             KAHILIPARA
             GUWAHATI 781019

            6:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE

             LAKHIMPUR REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
             LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT
             NORTH LAKHIMPUR
             ASSAM 787001

            7:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

             LAKHIMPUR
             POLAKHIMPUR
             DIST LAKHIMPUR
             ASSAM 78700

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P D NAIR

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM




                                 BEFORE
            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                          ORDER

Date : 14/09/2021

Heard Mr. P.D. Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents No.1, 3, 4, 5 and 7 being the authorities under the Elementary Education Department and Mr. G Pegu, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 6 being the authorities under the SLC and DLC respectively.

2. Issue notice, returnable by six weeks.

3. Extra copies of the writ petition be served on the learned counsel for Page No.# 3/5

the respondents within three days.

4. The father of the petitioner died in harness on 19/05/2002 and on his death the petitioner submitted an application for compassionate appointment on 15/10/2002. The petitioner was appointed after being recommended by the SLC in its meeting of 01.04.2014. We have taken note of that the recommendation by the DLC made in favour of the petitioner was in the meeting dated 10.08.2011.

5. Subsequently, there was a dispute as regards the recommendation of the DLC of Lakhimpur district in its meeting of 16.03.2013. Two lists were in circulation of the DLC meeting dated 16.03.2013. In one list four candidates were recommended, namely, Sri Jiten Boruah, Smti Parismita Dutta, Sri Mintu Gogoi and Sri Tushil Chetia. In another list also of 16.03.2013, fourteen candidates were recommended, namely, Sri Abhijit Bharali, Sri Amrit Handique, Sri Bolin Rajkhowa, Smti Tulika Hatiboruah, Sri Deni Dutta, Smti Niharika Arandhara, Sri Madhab Misra, Sri Nulim Hazarika, Sri Biswajit Gogoi, Sri Jitu Borah, Sri Jugananda Sarmah, Smti Sangita Chutia, Sri Abhilash Sarmah, Sri Hemanta Baruah.

6. An issue of there being a fake DLC recommendation came up before this Court in WP(C)No.2530/2017 and WP(C)No.2531/2017 wherein in a common order dated 01.09.2017, the list containing fourteen candidates was held to be not genuine. The order dated 01.09.2017 was also upheld by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.302/2017 and WA No.303/2017. Following the judgment, another order was passed by this Court dated 28.05.2018 in WP(C)No.278/2017 and other writ petitions. In the said order of 28.05.2018 relief was granted in Page No.# 4/5

favour of the candidates whose names were included in the genuine recommendation of the DLC dated 16.03.2013 by requiring the respondents to examine the cases of the candidates included in the non-genuine recommendation of 16.03.2013 under the law laid down in Achyut Ranjan Das Vs. State of Assam & Ors. reported in (2006) 4 GLT 674 and Faziron Nessa Vs. State of Assam & Ors. reported in (2010) 4 GLT 340. We are to understand that even in respect of the candidates included in the non-genuine list, the Court had provided for further examination of their cases as per the law laid down in the aforesaid two cases.

7. In the aforesaid circumstance, the order dated 14.06.2021 of the Additional Secretary to the Government of Assam, Elementary Education Department was communicated to the Director of Elementary Education Assam to terminate the services of some of the teachers who had been appointed on compassionate ground on the basis of fake DLC list and for the purpose, the order dated 28.05.2018 in WP(C)No.278/2017 and other writ petitions were referred. In the said order of 14.06.2021, the name of the petitioner Shri Promod Das is also included, meaning thereby, that there is a decision of the respondent authorities to terminate the service of the petitioner Shri Promod Das. Apparently, the reason for arriving at such a decision is that Shri Promod Das was a beneficiary of a fake recommendation of the DLC.

8. We have perused the list of fourteen candidates included in the fake DLC recommendation dated 16.03.2013 as well as the name of the respondents in WP(C) 278/2017 and other writ petitions. The name of the petitioner Shri Promod Das appears neither in the list of fourteen candidates in the fake DLC resolution nor he is a respondent in any of the writ petitions referred in the Page No.# 5/5

order dated 14.06.2021. In fact the materials on record reveals that the petitioner was recommended by the DLC dated 10.08.2011 and he has nothing to do with the recommendation of the DLC dated 16.03.2013. In the circumstance, we are of the prima facie view that the reason given in the order dated 14.06.2021 to terminate the services of the petitioner would be inapplicable in the case of the petitioner.

9. On a prima facie case being made out and also considering the balance of convenience and irreparable loss that the petitioner may suffer, the effect of the decision to terminate the services of the petitioner Shri Promod Das contained in the communication dated 14.06.2021 of the Additional Secretary to the Government of Assam, Elementary Education Department shall remain stayed until further order.

10. List after six weeks.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter