Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smti. Saraju Borah vs Oriental Insurance Company ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2031 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2031 Gua
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Smti. Saraju Borah vs Oriental Insurance Company ... on 1 September, 2021
                                                                    Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010008492017




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                              CO/44/2019

                            in MACApp./97/2018


           SMTI. SARAJU BORAH
           W/O SRI PORESH BORAH
           RESIDENT OF THENGAL GAON
           P.O. KAMARGAON
           DISTRICT GOLAGHAT
           ASSAM
           PIN 785619

           VERSUS

           ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 5 ORS
           HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD
           ULUBARI
           GUWAHATI-781007
           REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER

           2:CHAND SINGH
           S/O. LT. N. SINGH
            C/O SINHA ROADWAYS
            R/O SEVOKE ROAD
            P.O. SILIGURI
            DIST. DARJEELING
           WEST BENGAL
            PIN-734001. (OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-25/6583 (TRUCK))
            3:KRISHNA RAY
           S/O SRI BIJULI RAY
            R/O SEVOKE ROAD
            P.O. SILIGURI
            DIST. DARJEELING
           WEST BENGAL
            PIN-734001
                                                                               Page No.# 2/3

             (OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-25-6583 (TRUCK))
              4:PORESH BORAH
             S/O. LT RATNESWAR BORAH
              R/O. THENGAL GAON
              P.O. KAMARGAON
              DIST. GOLAGHAT
              ASSAM
              PIN-785621
             (OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO. AS-03-H-5278 (I20))
              5:MD. FAIJUL ALI
             S/O. MD. TAYEB ALI
              VILL. LETTEKU CHAPORI
              P.O. LETEKUJAN
              DIST. GOLAGHAT
              ASSAM
              PIN-785613

             (DRIVER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-03-H-5278 (I 20))
              6:THE MANAGER
              BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
             GUWAHATI BRANCH
              2B
              2ND FLOOR
              CENTRE POINT
              G.S. ROAD
              ULUBARI
              GUWAHATI
              KAMRUP (M)
              ASSAM
              PIN-781007
             (INSURER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-03-H-5278 (i 20)
              ------------
              Advocate for : MR. M DUTTA
             Advocate for : MS. R D MOZUMDAR appearing for ORIENTAL INSURANCE
             COMPANY LIMITED AND 5 ORS


                                   BEFORE
                  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                         ORDER

01.09.2021

The court proceedings have been conducted through online court proceeding services. Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the cross-objector. Also heard Ms. R.D. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel for Page No.# 3/3

the respondent no. 6.

This cross-objection under Order XLI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred in connection with MAC App. 97/2018. The connected appeal, MAC App. 97/2018 is directed against the judgment and award dated 10.07.2017 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat ("Tribunal" for short) in MAC Case No. 29/2014. The appeal, MAC App. 97/2018 was admitted on 19.07.2019. The cross-objection has been filed on 19.08.2019.

The cross-objection is admitted for Hearing.

The LCR of MAC Case No.29/2014 has already been received in connection with MAC App. 97.2018.

Issue Notice returnable in 4 (four) weeks.

As Ms. Mozumdar has entered appearance for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. Hazarika has entered appearance for the respondent no. 6, no formal notices need to be issued to the said respondents.

Mr. Dutta has submitted that in the connected appeal, MAC App. 97/2018 the names of the respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 3 have been striked off from the array of respondents and as such, he has made a prayer to strike off the names of the respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 3 from the array of respondents in the present cross-objection also.

Both Ms. Mozumdar and Mr. Hazarika have submitted that the prayer made by the cross-objector may be allowed at his cost and peril.

The prayer for striking off the names of respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 3 from the array of respondents in this cross-objection is allowed at the cost and peril of the cross- objector.

Registry to make necessary correction in the cause title of the cross-objection. The cross-objector shall take steps for service of notice on the respondent no. 4 and respondent no. 5 by usual process as well as by registered post with AD within 3 (three) days.

List the cross-objection along with MAC App. 97/2018 after four weeks.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter