Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 2543 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2543 Gua
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 26 October, 2021
                                                                  Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010005242021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/299/2021

         DEBEN NARZARY AND 3 ORS
         S/O- KHAGEN NARZARY, R/O- JOOR PUJHURI, P.O. HATIGARH,
         MANGALDOI, DIST.- UDALGURI, PIN- 784160, ASSAM

         2: GAUTAM KUMAR RABHA
          S/O- NABIN SARANIA
          R/O- VILL- GHOGAPARA
          P.O. BHERGAON
          MANGALDOI
          DIST.- UDALGURI
         ASSAM

         3: KARNA RAM BARO
          S/O- SRI HARESWAR BARO
         VILL- MAHALIAPARA
          P.O. BHERGAON
          DIST.- UDALGURI
         ASSAM

         4: RAJIV SARMAH
          S/O- DURGADHAR SARMAH
          R/O- VILL- SSUB MAHALIAPARA
          P.O. BAMLAKHAT
          DIST.- UDALGURI
         ASSA

         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
         REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
         (SECONDARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6

         2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
         ASSAM
                                                                       Page No.# 2/4

             KAHILIPARA
             GHY-19

            3:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
             BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
             KOKRAJHAR

            4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
             UDALGURI DISTRICT CIRCLE
             UDALGURI
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. U J SAIKIA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.




                                 BEFORE
            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                            ORDER

Date : 26-10-2021

Heard Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the Secondary Education Department of the Government of Assam and Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent BTC.

2. The petitioners are all serving as Subject Teachers/Assistant Teachers in their respective Secondary Schools and were appointed prior to 03.07.2012. The detail particulars of the petitioners are extracted below:

SL. NO.        Name       of Name       of Date     Year      of
               Schools        incumbent joining     passing
                              s      with           B.Ed
                              designatio            degree
                              n
                                                                                Page No.# 3/4

1.            Balipara       Sri   Deben 20/11/199 2019
              Krishak        Narzary,     9
              Mukti High A/T
              School

2.            Khoirabari Sri       Karna 11/12/201 2019

              School

3.            Jhargaon       Sri    Rajib 11/12/201 2019
              High           Sarmah,      0
              School         A/T

4.            Bhergaon       Sri Gautam 18/05/199 2019
              Uchha          Kr. Rabha, 9
              Vidyapith      A/T



3. All the petitioners in course of their services had acquired the B.Ed degree from recognized institutes/universities. The petitioners rely upon a communication dated 21.07.2016 from the Joint Director of Secondary Education, Assam addressed to all the Inspector of Schools. The communication provides that as per the order dated 16.02.2016 in WP(C) No.6241/2015, all Assistant Teachers who have B.Ed degree are eligible to get their one advance increment provided the person concerned had joined before 03.07.2012 and had obtained the B.Ed degree from a UGC recognized University and NCTE approved B.Ed college. It is also stated that the issue as regards the entitlement of an advance increment had been decided by this Court in its judgment dated Page No.# 4/4

18.07.2019 in WP(C) No.8245/2018, wherein a direction was issued to the respondent authorities in the manner as extracted below:-

"10. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondent authorities to verify the claim of the petitioners that they fulfil the aforesaid two conditions mentioned in the said Circular dated 21.07.2016. If it is found that they do satisfy the said conditions, they should be given the benefit as given to others.

4. As the petitioners are also similarly placed, we also issue a similar direction directing the respondent authorities to verify the claim of the petitioners that they fulfil the two conditions provided in the communication dated 21.07.2016 and if they do satisfy the two conditions, they be given the benefits as given to other similarly situated persons.

5. The requirements be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

The writ petition stands allowed as indicated above.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter