Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Premjit Boro vs The State Of Assam And 8 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 3062 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3062 Gua
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Premjit Boro vs The State Of Assam And 8 Ors on 24 November, 2021
                                                                 Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010190992021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/6194/2021

         PREMJIT BORO
         S/O LT. SANDISWAR BORO, VILL. GHORAMARA, P.O. RANCHAIDHAM, P.S.
         BASUGAON, DIST. CHIRANG, PIN 783372



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY., PWD DEPTT. TO THE
         GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006

         2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
          REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY.
          KOKRAJHAR 783370

         3:THE JOINT SECY. BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

          KOKRAJHAR 783370

         4:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER

          PWD
          BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
          KOKRAJHAR 783370

         5:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

          PWD (R AND B)
          CIRCLE KOKRAJHAR 783370

         6:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
          BTC
          KOKRAJHAR 783370
                                                                                              Page No.# 2/5


              7:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
               DRDA
               CHIRANG
               KAJALGAON 783385

              8:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

              PWD
              CHIRANG (R AND B)
              KAJALGAON
              CHIRANG 783385

              9:THE BLOCK DEV. OFFICER

              SIDLI CHIRANG DEV. BLOCK
              SIDLI
              CHIRANG 78338

Advocate for the Petitioner      : MR. U K NAIR

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM




                                      BEFORE
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                                 ORDER

24.11.2021

Heard Mr. A. Boro, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Public Works Department for the respondent no. 1 as well as Standing Counsel, BTC for the respondent nos. 2 - 9.

The subject-matter in this writ petition is execution of a contract work viz. "Earth filling & sand gravelling near Haliram house at Choto Amguri village road" ['the Contract-Work'] and non-disbursal of an amount of Rs. 9,22,680/- in favour of the petitioner which the petitioner has claimed to be due from the authorities in the BTC. The case projected by the petitioner in this writ petition is that administrative approval for an estimated cost not exceeding Rs. 9,32,000/- for execution of the Contract-Work was accorded vide an order dated 09.04.2018 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition]. The technical sanction for the Contract-Work for the same amount was accorded by an order dated Page No.# 3/5

02.05.2018 [Annexure-3 to the writ petition]. A tender notice was published thereafter and a number of bidders including the petitioner, submitted their bids in response to it. After evaluation of the bids, the respondent no. 8 issued a formal work order dated 11.06.2018 in favour of the petitioner to execute the Contract-Work at an amount of Rs. 9,22,680/- [Annexure-4 to the writ petition]. The petitioner has asserted that he proceeded to execute the Contract-Work as per the specifications, drawings and agreement and completed the same on 20.03.2019. The authorities in the respondent BTC physically verified the Contract-Work and found that the Contract-Work had been completed as per the specifications, drawings, and agreement. In that connection, the respondent no. 8 had issued a completion certificate dated 20.03.2019 [Annexure-5-colly to the writ petition]. After completion of the Contract-Work, the petitioner submitted his final bill amounting to Rs. 9,22,680/- but the amount has remained outstanding, which fact is evident from a communication dated 20.03.2019 [Annexure-5- colly to the writ petition]. As the said amount has not been disbursed till date, the petitioner has approached this court by this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to disburse the said amount.

Ms. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, BTC has submitted that though from the documents annexed to this writ petition it is prima facie reflected that the petitioner had completed the Contract- Work but still there is requirement for verification of the matter. It is submitted that a decision has been taken by the respondent BTC authorities to examine all the pending claims relating to contract works and to that effect, the respondent no. 2 has passed an order on 15.11.2021. As per the said order, the respondent BTC authorities have undertaken to examine all the cases relating to outstanding liabilities within a period of 6 [six] months from the date of issuance of the said order. Ms. Bora has placed a copy of the said order before this Court.

The order bearing No. BTC/F(Audit)/49/2021/Pt-I/1] dated Kokrajhar, the 15th November, 2021 reads as under :-

" ORDER

WHEREAS it has been noticed that huge number of outstanding liabilities have been created by the erstwhile BTAD authority since 2011 to February, 2020 through contractual work orders to the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. under various entrusted departments of BTC without corresponding budget provisions

WHEREAS the outstanding liabilities created by the erstwhile BTAD authority are Page No.# 4/5

required to undergo detail examination and verification in the context of proposals of such works made, NIT, selection of successful bidders, quality of works, completion of works, fund position, part payment, etc.

WHEREAS it is further noticed that a good number of court cases have been filed before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court as well as in the District Courts of respective District Jurisdictions under BTAD by the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. praying for release of payments to the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. against their respective work orders

WHEREAS, reportedly, out of the aforesaid contractual works, some part payments also made against portion of works completed by the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. by the erstwhile BTAD authority in certain cases. However, such fund flow does not follow any rationale and is found to be arbitrant

AND THEREFORE, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the BTC has decided to verify all such works by conducting comprehensive audit, financial verification and physical verification wherever applicable, against all such contractual works in the Govt. level and further to complete the whole exercise in this regard within 6 (six) months from the date of issue of this order. After verifying the same, if it is found that the claims are admissible after following all established financial norms, the same shall be processed in accordance with law and as per decision contained in Tamsher Ali and others vs. State of Assam and others reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1 accordingly. Furthermore, if instances of wrongdoing or misappropriation are found during such comprehensive audit, financial verification and physical verification wherever applicable, appropriate legal action would be taken against the persons/agencies/firms concerned in accordance with the applicable laws.

This order shall come into force with immediate effect."

Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner having gone through the said order, has submitted that the process regarding payment of the outstanding dues to the petitioner shall be completed within Page No.# 5/5

the stipulated time period as mentioned in the said order.

Having considered the contents of the said order dated 15.11.2021 and the decision of the Full Bench judgment of this Court, rendered on 29.09.2008, in Writ Appeal No. 484/2005 [Tamsher Ali and Ors. vs. State of Assam and Ors.], reported in 2008 [4] GLT 1 [FB] and similar other 194 writ petitions, it is considered appropriate that the respondent authorities in the respondent BTC shall undertake the exercise in terms of the said order dated 15.11.2021 in respect of the claims of the petitioner also and complete the exercise within the time frame mentioned in the order. If after such exercise, the petitioner is found entitled to the amount of Rs. 9,22,680/- or any other amount, the same shall be released in favour of the petitioner forthwith thereafter.

The petitioner shall submit a certified copy of this order to the Additional Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajhar for his doing the needful.

The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observation and direction.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter