Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/5 vs Food Corporation Of India And 6 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1651 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1651 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/5 vs Food Corporation Of India And 6 Ors on 13 July, 2021
                                                               Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010054752021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/3159/2021

         RAJ KUMAR DAS AND 8 ORS
         S/O LATE DHORAI DAS, R/O BANK COLONY SURBHI NAGAR HOUSE NO. 9,
         P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM, P.S. CHANDMARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI,
         PIN 781021, ASSAM.

         2: DEBU SAH
          S/O LATE NARAYAN SAH
          R/O PUBJYOTI NAGAR HOUSE NO. 50
          BYE LANE NO. 13
          NEPALI CHOWK
          P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
          DIST. KAMRUP (M)
          GUWAHATI
          PIN 781020 ASSAM.

         3: MEWALAL KEWOT

          S/O LATE MANNU KEWOT
          R/O M.R.D. ROAD NEW GUWAHATI HOUSE NO. 74
          P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
          DIST. KAMRUP (M)
          GUWAHATI
          PIN 781020
          ASSAM.

         4: PAWAN CHOUDHURY

          S/O BISNUDEO CHOUDHURY
          R/O SONCHALIS KANCHAN NAGAR
          BILPAR HOUSE NO. 42
          P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
          DIST. KAMRUP (M)
          GUWAHATI
          PIN 781020
                               Page No.# 2/5

ASSAM.

5: AMARJIT SAHANI

S/O TIRO SAHANI
R/O BHABANIPUR SONALI PATH
P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
PIN 781020
ASSAM.

6: RAJ KUMAR SAHANI

S/O LATE SURESH SAHANI
R/O BAMUNIMAIDAM GATE NO. 6
HOUSE NO. 55
P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM
P.S. CHANDMARI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI 781021
ASSAM.

7: UDAY CHANDRA YADAV
 S/O LATE BHORIL YADAV
 R/O TIN ALI GANESH MANDIR
 HOUSE NO. 18
 P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
 DIST. KAMRUP (M)
 GUWAHATI
 PIN 781020
ASSAM.

8: HARE RAM
 S/O SRI RAM CHANDRA MAHATO
 R/O MAJHGARIYA NO. 2
 HOUSE NO. 186
 P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
 DIST. KAMRUP (M)
 GUWAHATI
 PIN 781020
ASSAM.

9: MUNILAL SAHANI
 S/O DUKHA SAHANI
 R/O KARBINAGAR
 P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM
 P.S. CHANDMARI
                                                     Page No.# 3/5

DIST. KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
PIN 781021
ASSAM

VERSUS

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY (CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR) 16-20,
BARAKKHAMBA LANE, NEW DELHI 110001

2:EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NORTH EAST ZONE

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
G.L. PUBLICATION BUILDING
G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI 781008

3:GENERAL MANAGER
 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
 REGIONAL OFFICE ASSAM PALTAN BAZAR
 GUWAHATI 781008

4:DIVISIONAL MANAGER

FOOD CORPORATION INDIA
ULUBARI
MITRA BUILDING
GUWAHATI 781007

5:MANAGER ACCOUNTS

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
ULUBARI
MITRA BUILDING
GUWAHATI 781007

6:MANAGER (IR)
 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
 ULUBARI
 MITRA BUILDING
 GUWAHATI 781007

7:MANAGER DEPOT

FOOD STORAGE DEPOT
NEW GUWAHATI
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI 78102
                                                                                     Page No.# 4/5


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR A DASGUPTA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, F C I




                                   BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

                                           ORDER

13.07.2021

Heard Mr. A. Dasgupta, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, who submits that the petitioners are paid incentives if they can do the job of replacement of more than 42 torn bags per day i.e., money is given for replacing torn bags beyond the 42nd bag. He submits that an Audit Report for the year 2012-2013, 2013-2014 showed that there was a difference between the bag issued for filling food-grains as per stock account and work certified and as per the actual bags that were taken into count. He submits that the respondents are proposing to recover the incentives from the petitioners. However, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and Others vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334, it is submitted that recovery cannot be allowed.

Issue Notice returnable in 4 (four) weeks.

Mr. P.K. Roy, learned standing counsel for the respondents accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that the case of Rafiq Masih (supra), would not be applicable to the facts of this case, inasmuch as, while the FCI had issued approximately 57,521 bags for filling up food-grains, over 12 lakhs bags have been alleged to have been filled up. He submits that this amounts to cheating.

List the matter on 23.07.2021 to enable the FCI to file their affidavit-in-opposition.

The prayer of interim relief shall be considered on the next date.

JUDGE Page No.# 5/5

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter