Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 296 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010047532020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1443/2020
KRISHNA DEY
W/O .T. NIKHIL CHANDRA DEY, R/O VILL. GAURIPUR, WARD NO. 1, RANI
NIHARBALA BARUAH PATH, P.O. GAURIPUR, P.S. GAURIPUR, DIST.
DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783331
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECREATRY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. DISPUR
GHY-6
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
ASSAM
UZANBAZAR
GHY-1
4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETRY
FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR
GHY-6
5:THE SUPERINTENDENT
DESTITUTE HOME DIGHALTARI
P.O.AND P.S. HALAKURA
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783301
6:THE TREASURY OFFICER
Page No.# 2/3
DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-78330
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
29.01.2021
Heard Mr. K. Islam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M.D. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, & 5.
This is an application for payment of arrear salary for the month of February, 2004, November, 2008, December, 2008 and January, 2009. The further prayer of the petitioner is that he should be given his dues with regard to Nil Bill and increments. The petitioner has made a representation for payment of the above dues only on 14.03.2019, though the petitioner had retired from service on 31.08.2017. The writ petition has been filed on 25.02.2020.
This Court, vide order dated 06.03.2020, had directed the petitioner to inform this Court as to what was meant by "Nil Bill" and the specifics with regard to the increments allegedly due to the petitioner. However, no explanation with regard to the queries put forth by this Court is forthcoming. Accordingly, there are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be decided by this Writ Court. Further, as can be seen from the pleadings, the petitioner has prayed for arrear salary for one month in the year 2004, two months in the year 2008 and one month in the year 2009. The petitioner has made a representation for payment of the above arrear salary for four months only on 14.03.2019, though the petitioner had retired from service on 31.08.2017. The prayer for payment of arrear salary with regard to February, 2004, November and December, 2008 and June, 2009 is hit by laches and delay. The claims are also barred in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in "Harendra Chandra Nath -vs- State of Tripura, reported in (2013) 2 GLT 1094."
In view of the reasons stated above, this Court holds that the prayer for payment of arrear salary cannot be granted by this Court. However, with regard to the other prayers made by the petitioner, the petitioner may Page No.# 3/3
approach the Civil Court as per law, if so advised.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!