Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahammad Ali vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 651 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 651 Gua
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Mahammad Ali vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 24 February, 2021
                                                                  Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010167952020




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2010/2020

         MAHAMMAD ALI
         S/O- NALCHAND ALI @ LALCHAN ALI,, VILL- PALARPAM, P.S. BAGHBAR,
         DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781308, PH. NO. 9126543540



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF
         INDIA, NEW DELHI-01

         2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GHY-6

         3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
          BARPETA
         ASSAM
          781301

         4:THE SUPERINTENNDENT OF POLICE (B)
          BARPETA
          781301

         5:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER
         ASSAM
          HOUSEFED DISPUR
          GHY-6

         6:THE NODAL OFFICER
          NRC
                                                                                   Page No.# 2/4

              BHANGAGARH
              GHY-

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A A AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA order 24-02 -2021

[N. Kotiswar Singh, J]

Heard Mr. A. Dasgupta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.A. Ahmed, learned

counsel for the applicant/petitioner. Also heard Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC

appearing for respondent No.1; Mr. J. Payeng, learned Special Counsel, F.T. for the

respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4, Ms. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel, ECI, appearing for

respondent No.5 and Ms. L. Devi, learned standing counsel, NRC, appearing for respondent

No.6.

2. The case of the applicant is that the applicant has been declared as a foreigner in

terms of the judgment/opinion dated 10.09.2018 rendered by the Foreigner Tribunal No.4,

Barpeta in F.T. Case No.132/2017. According to him, though he is an Indian Citizen but was

wrongly opined as a foreigner by the learned Tribunal. Learned counsel for the applicant

submits that the authorities nevertheless, included the names of the father and his children in

the National Registration of Citizens (NRC), in support of which he has annexed Annexure-1,

a copy of the relevant portion of the NRC. According to the applicant, the father of the

applicant, namely, Lalchan Ali, mother Jahira Khatun and their children Jakir Husssain and Page No.# 3/4

Junap Ali have been included in the NRC. According to him, this situation obtaining is

irreconcilable for the reason that a person who has been dubbed to be a foreigner cannot

have immediate relatives and siblings as Indian Citizens, deserving inclusion in the NRC.

Accordingly, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that this issue

needs to be verified by the authorities. Learned counsel for the applicant accordingly, submits

that during the pendency of this writ petition challenging the validity of the impugned opinion

dated 10.09.2018 rendered by the Foreigner Tribunal No.4, Barpeta in F.T. Case No.132/2017,

the petitioner, who has been in Goalpara detention camp since 02.05.2019, may be enlarged

on bail.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials on

records.

4. We are also of the view that in spite of the applicant being categorised as a foreigner, if it is

found that his father and brothers are included in the records of NRC as Indian Citizens, the case of

the applicant can be considered in the light of his immediate relatives, who have been declared as

Indian Citizens, and as such, he would be entitled to get certain interim benefit by virtue of his

immediate relatives mentioned above, being included in the NRC as Indians.

5. Accordingly, the applicant who is stated to be in detention in Goalpara detention Camp is

directed to be released on bail. Since his citizenship is under cloud, until further order, he will remain

on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) with one local surety of the

like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta. The concerned

Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, shall also take steps for capturing the fingerprints and

biometrics of the iris of the applicant, if so advised. The applicant also shall not leave the jurisdiction

of Barpeta district without furnishing the details of the place of destination and necessary information Page No.# 4/4

including contact number to the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta and the applicant shall

appear before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta as and when directed by the

Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta.

6. I.A. (Civil) stands allowed.

                                                JUDGE                             JUDGE


Comparing Assistant
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter