Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1905 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010118252020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/435/2020
MD. ABDUL JUBBAR
S/O MD. SULEMAN ALI, R/O VILL. BALIGAON, P.S. DALGAON, DIST.
DARRANG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM.
2:NOOR SHAHIDA KHATOON
D/O MD. SAHED ALI
VILL. BALIGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. C GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
Linked Case : Crl.A./179/2020
MD. ABDUL JUBBAR
S/O MD. SULEMAN ALI
R/O VILL. BALIGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP
ASSAM.
2:NOOR SHAHIDA KHATOON
D/O MD. SAHED ALI
VILL. BALIGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. C GOSWAMI
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
19.08.2021
Hearing held through remote video conference. Heard Mr. C. Goswami, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant as well as Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent No.1.
By this interlocutory application under Section 389 (2) Cr.P.C., the applicant/appellant, who is convicted and sentenced vide the impugned Judgment and Order, dated 18.02.2020, passed in Sessions Case No. 133(DM)/2017 by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai, Assam, has prayed for suspension of sentence and to allow him to go on bail.
I have heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the Page No.# 3/3
records including the impugned judgment and order, dated 18.02.2020, passed in Sessions Case No. 133(DM)/2017 by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai, Assam. It appears that the victim was a minor girl at the time of the alleged incident being her date of birth is 02.01.2002 vide the School Certificate (Exhibit-3). On 09.03.2017, she gave birth to a female child. The victim (P.W.1), in her statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., has implicated the applicant/appellant with the commission of the alleged offences. Without going deep into the merit of the case, this court finds that at this stage, the accused appellant cannot be released on bail by suspending the operation of the sentence passed in the impugned judgment and order.
Therefore, the interlocutory application stands rejected.
This disposes of the Interlocutory Application.
The Registry shall take necessary steps for listing the connected appeal as early as possible.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!