Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chibuzor vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi
2026 Latest Caselaw 1932 Del

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1932 Del
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Chibuzor vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi on 2 April, 2026

                          $~76
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                          Date of Decision: 02.04.2026
                          +      BAIL APPLN. 1289/2026 & CRL.M.A. 10105/2026
                                 CHIBUZOR                                           .....Petitioner
                                                   Through:     Mr. Shyam       Sunder      Aggarwal,
                                                                Advocate.

                                                   versus

                                 THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI                  .....Respondent
                                               Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
                                                        with SI Chandra Shekhar.

                                 CORAM:           JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 578/2022 of Police Station Vikaspuri for offence under Section 21 NDPS Act & Section 14 Foreigners Act.

2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Chandra Shekhar.

3. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, on the basis of secret information, a trap was laid by police and the accused/applicant was apprehended and after completion of procedural formalities, from bag

BAIL APPLN. 1289/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages

GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT

KATHPALIA st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA

Digitally Signed Date: 2026.04.02 18:04:14 -07'00'

By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:02.04.2026 18:08:56 carried by the accused/applicant, 502 grams heroin was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that grounds of arrest were not verbally explained to the accused/applicant. It is also contended that testimony of witnesses examined during trial reflect a number of contradictions, which show that the prosecution case is not truthful. It is also contended that the chain of custody of the contraband is doubtful. Learned counsel for accused/applicant also contends that the Head Constable, who received the secret information as per FIR, was not competent to conduct the raid, therefore, the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail.

5. Learned APP strongly opposes the bail application on the ground that the quantity of heroin recovered from the accused/applicant was much more than even double the commercial quantity, consequently, the twin conditions of Section 37 NDPS Act come into play.

6. It is trite that at the stage of bail, the court cannot minutely examine the evidence on record. It is only broad contours of the evidence that have to be kept in mind. The FIR clearly shows that the Head Constable, after receiving the secret information, produced the informer before the Sub Inspector, who satisfied himself after speaking with the secret informer and then shared the information with the concerned ACP. It is the concerned ACP, who authorized the raid.

7. None of the arguments advanced on behalf of the accused/applicant

BAIL APPLN. 1289/2026 Page 2 of 3 pages

GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a

OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003,

KATHPALIA st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 6b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa,

Digitally Signed cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.02 18:04:03 -07'00'

By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:02.04.2026 18:08:56 would satisfy the twin conditions stipulated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. There has to be an argument and material before the bail court, which can satisfy the court that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offence charged and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

8. In my considered opinion, the case set up by the accused/applicant in the present case fails at the anvil of twin conditions laid down under Section 37 NDPS Act, therefore, the bail application is dismissed. Accompanying application stands disposed of.

9. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for being conveyed to the accused/applicant. Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA

GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.02 18:03:51 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) APRIL 2, 2026/ry

BAIL APPLN. 1289/2026 Page 3 of 3 pages

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter