Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumar Shanu And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 5776 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5776 Del
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2025

Delhi High Court

Kumar Shanu And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 19 November, 2025

                          $~55
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                          Date of decision: 19.11.2025
                          ,,,,,,,,,,




                          +            CRL.M.C. 8242/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34390/2025 EXEMPTION
                                       KUMAR SHANU AND ANR                       .....Petitioner
                                                        Through:     Mr. Kumar Pranav, Adv. with
                                                                     all petitioners in person.

                                                        versus

                                       STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR                .....Respondent
                                                        Through:     Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP
                                                                     with SI H. R. Choudhary, PS
                                                                     Gandhi Nagar.
                                                                     Mr. Raj Gaurav, Adv. for R-2
                                                                     & R-3 with respondent nos. 2 &
                                                                     3 in person.

                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                                  JUDGMENT(ORAL)

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 492/2021, dated 24.10.2021, registered at P.S Gandhi Nagar, District Shahdara, Delhi under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. As per allegations in the FIR, the scooty driven by petitioner no. 2 collided with respondent no. 2 resulting in an altercation. Petitioner no. 2 called his brother i.e. petitioner no. 1 and they pulled the hair of respondent no. 2 and gave him slaps and leg blows and also threatened to kill him. FIR no. 492/2021 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2. It is submitted that charge sheet has since been filed and charges have been framed.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Settlement Deed/Agreement dated 18.09.2025, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-4.

4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI H. R. Choudhary, from PS Gandhi Nagar.

5. Respondent no. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and he has no objection if the FIR No. 492/2021 is quashed against the Petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 492/2021 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675.

9. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

10. The petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 492/2021, dated 24.10.2021, registered at P.S Gandhi Nagar, District Shahdara, Delhi under section 323/341/506/34 IPC and all the other consequential

proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed subject to petitioners depositing Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with Delhi High Court Advocates' Welfare Trust, bearing Account No. 15530210002995, maintained with UCO Bank within a month.

11. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

12. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J November 19, 2025 SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter