Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramesh Rajpal vs Rohit Rajpal & Ors.
2025 Latest Caselaw 2865 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2865 Del
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025

Delhi High Court

Ramesh Rajpal vs Rohit Rajpal & Ors. on 19 March, 2025

Author: Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Bench: Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
                                   $~35
                                   *        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                                            Date of decision: 19th March, 2025

                                   +        CS(OS) 53/2025, I.A. 2069-2070/2025 & I.A. 7084/2025
                                            RAMESH RAJPAL                               .....Plaintiff
                                                              Through:     Mr Dinesh Garg and Ms Rachna
                                                                           Agrawal Advocates
                                                              versus

                                            ROHIT RAJPAL & ORS.                       .....Defendants
                                                         Through:          Ms. Vandana Bhatnagar, adv. for D-1
                                                                           to 3
                                   %
                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
                                                              JUDGMENT

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

I.A. 7084/2025 (joint application on behalf of the Plaintiff and Defendants under Order XXIII Rule 3 and 3A read with Section 151 CPC)

1. This is an application jointly filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 and 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC').

2. Mr. Garg, learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that he has personally known the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 for a long time and the application as well as affidavits have been executed by parties in his presence. Similarly, Ms. Vandana Bhatnagar, Advocate confirms that all the pleadings and affidavit have been executed by Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in her presence. They state that it is in these circumstances that the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are not present in Court today.

Signing Date:02.04.2025 14:46:58

3. The statements of the counsels are taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the parties' state that the subject matter of the present suit is freehold built-up Farm House, known as 'Manjula Farms' situated in Village Chattarpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi comprising land measuring 12 Bighas and 2 Biswas under Khasra No.1135/1 (4-0), 1138/1 (3-12), 1134/2 (2-1), 1133/2 (2-9), bearing Farm House No.1, Mandi Road, Sultanpur, New Delhi ('suit property').

5. It is stated that the Plaintiff along with Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are the only Class I legal heirs of late Smt. Manju Rajpal. It is stated that as per the settlement dated 25.09.2024 arrived at between the parties, Defendant Nos.

1, 2 and 3 have agreed to relinquish all their right, title or interest in favour of the Plaintiff herein and consequently make the Plaintiff absolute owner of the said property. It is stated that the terms of the settlement have been set out in paragraph 4 (i) to (xiv) of the captioned application.

6. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that as per the terms of the settlement the Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have undertaken that they will execute registered relinquishment deeds in favour of the Plaintiff so as to confer an absolute and clear title on the Plaintiff. He states by seeking a decree in these proceedings the Plaintiff and the Defendants are not seeking to evade the legal requirement of executing registered relinquishment deeds. He states that the intent of this application is to record the settlement so as to avoid inter-se disputes.

7. This Court has perused the terms of the settlement and is of the opinion that the same are lawful.

Signing Date:02.04.2025 14:46:58

8. In view of the aforesaid submissions of the parties and settlement arrived at between the parties, the application is allowed and the suit qua the suit property is decreed in terms of paragraph 4 of the captioned application to record the inter-se arrangement between the parties. It is clarified that passing of this decree will not exempt the Plaintiff and Defendants from complying with the requirement of execution of the relinquishment deeds and/or registration of this decree as per the mandate of Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908.

9. The registry is directed to draw up a decree shall be prepared in terms of paragraph 4 of the captioned application and the contents of the said paragraph 4 shall form part of the decree.

10. The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms. CS(OS) 53/2025

11. Accordingly, the suit stands decreed as above.

12. Pending applications are disposed of.

13. All future dates are cancelled.

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J MARCH 19, 2025/msh/AKP Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Signing Date:02.04.2025 14:46:58

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter