Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karan Kumar vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 1273 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1273 Del
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2025

Delhi High Court

Karan Kumar vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 5 August, 2025

                          $~82
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                          Date of decision: 05.08.2025
                          ,,,,,,,,,,




                          +            CRL.M.C. 5252/2025 & CRL.M.A. 22706/2025 EXEMPTION
                                       KARAN KUMAR                             .....Petitioner
                                                       Through: Mr.      Sunil       Kumar,    Ms.
                                                                 Geetanjali Rana & Mr. Mayank
                                                                 Pandey, Advs. along with
                                                                 petitioner in person.
                                                     versus
                                       STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.        ... Respondents
                                                     Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the
                                                               State with ASI Anil Kumar
                                                               Mr. S.K. Tiwari & Mr. Sarthak
                                                               Dua, Advs. for R-2 along with
                                                               R-2 in person.

                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                                  JUDGMENT(ORAL)

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0182/2019, dated 06.07.2019,registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 05.05.2013 as per Hindu rites and customs at Delhi. A male child was born out of the said wedlock. As per

averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioner. Chargesheet has since been filed under section 498A/406/34 IPC.Petitioner has been discharged under section 406/34 IPC and charged only under section 498A IPC.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Memorandum of Understanding dated 18.12.2021. In respect of the aforesaid settlement, Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 have dissolved their marriage by mutual consent on 19.01.2023. It is submitted that all conditions of the Settlement Agreement have been fulfilled including the payment of the total settlement amount of Rs. 1,70,000/- (Rupees One lac and Seventy Thousand only) as per the schedule mentioned in the Settlement Deed. It is further submitted that the custody of the child would be with Respondent No. 2. Copy of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 18.12.2021 has been annexed as Annexure P-4.

4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer ASI Anil Kumar from PS Tigri.

5. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioner without any force, fear, coercion and she has no objection if the FIR No. 0182/2019 is quashed against the Petitioner.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0182/2019 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 0182/2019, dated 06.07.2019, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 0182/2019, dated 06.07.2019, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J August 05, 2025 SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter