Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shafeena Begum vs Rajender Singh Sisodia
2024 Latest Caselaw 5997 Del

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5997 Del
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2024

Delhi High Court

Shafeena Begum vs Rajender Singh Sisodia on 10 September, 2024

Author: Dharmesh Sharma

Bench: Dharmesh Sharma

                  $~64
                  *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                  %                                Date of decision: 10th September, 2024
                  +       CONT.CAS(C) 1441/2024
                          SHAFEENA BEGUM                                 .....Petitioner
                                      Through:             Mr.     A.K.        Mishra,    Mr.
                                                           Sudhanshu Dwivedi, Mr. Arpit
                                                           Mishra      and       Mr.     Anik
                                                           Srivastava, Advs. alongwith
                                                           petitioner in person

                                                versus

                          RAJENDER SINGH SISODIA                        .....Respondent
                                       Through: None.

                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

                  DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 52849/2024 - EXMP.

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1441/2024

3. The petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings for the willful disobedience on the part of the respondent/judgment debtor for not complying with the judgment dated 11.12.2014 passed by the learned Trial Court in Suit No. 18/2005, titled as Shafeena Begum vs. Rajender Singh Sisodia & Ors. filed under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, and as was affirmed by this Court in CM(M) 176/2015 vide judgment dated 24.04.2024.

CONT.CAS(C) 1441/2024

KUMAR VATS Signing Date:11.09.2024 17:48:14

4. No one is present for the respondent despite sending advance notice.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is but apparent that the judgment dated 11.12.2014 passed by the learned Trial Court was upheld by this Court on filing of the Civil Revision No. 176/2015 vide order dated 24.04.2024. In fact, the SLP filed by the respondent/judgment debtor has since been dismissed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 09.07.2024.

6. The grievance of the petitioner is that although possession of the premises has been taken over by her from the respondent/judgment debtor, the respondent/judgment debtor has not made payment of misuse charges/mesne profits @ Rs.7,500/- per month w.e.f. 11.12.2014.

7. Without any further ado, the present contempt petition is not maintainable. The impugned decree as affirmed in the Civil Revision proceedings before this Court, is clearly an executive order and the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to file execution proceedings.

8. At this stage, as requested by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner/decree-holder to approach the learned Trial Court/Executing Court for redressal of her grievances.

9. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 sa

CONT.CAS(C) 1441/2024

KUMAR VATS Signing Date:11.09.2024 17:48:14

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter