Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Neena Yadav vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 505 Del

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 505 Del
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2024

Delhi High Court

Neena Yadav vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 19 January, 2024

Author: Tushar Rao Gedela

Bench: Tushar Rao Gedela

                          $~76
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                    Judgment delivered on: 19.01.2024
                          +      W.P.(C) 825/2024
                                 NEENA YADAV                                          ..... Petitioner

                                                      versus

                                 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR                        ..... Respondents

                                 Advocates who appeared in this case:

                                 For the Petitioner      :     Ms. Shriya Chanda and Mr. Shreyuss S
                                                               Joshi, Advocates

                                 For the Respondents :         Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Advocate

                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
                                                      JUDGMENT

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 825/2024

3. Keeping in view the judgments of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in respect of the recruitment processes of the Central Government or Delhi Government being subject matter of Section 14 of the Administrative

Tribunal Act, 1965 and consequently, such challenges being barred to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present writ petition would not be maintainable as such before this Court.

4. Ms. Shriya Chanda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, in fact, is one of the candidates, who had cleared Tier-I and Tier-II examinations and by misfortune had missed the deadline for submission of the form for the renotified examination, which was done in compliance of the order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (C) Nos. 5785-5786/2020 titled Sachin Kumar and Others vs. DSSSB and Others. She requests that the present petition be transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in order to save time and administrative delay.

5. In view of the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner as also after having perused the issue raised therein, it is considered appropriate to sent the present writ petition to the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi to be renumbered as original application in accordance with the regulations.

6. It is requested that the learned Tribunal may take up for consideration the present petition on 23.01.2024.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the petition is disposed of.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J JANUARY 19, 2024 Aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter