Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tripta Chawla & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3948 Del

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3948 Del
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2023

Delhi High Court
Tripta Chawla & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ... on 27 September, 2023
                          $~63
                          *       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                                             Date of decision: 27.09.2023

                          +       CM(M) 1604/2023 & CM APPLs. 50438/2023, 50439/2023
                                  TRIPTA CHAWLA & ORS.                                ..... Petitioner
                                                     Through:      Mr. Prakash      Gautam,      Advocate
                                                                   (through VC)
                                                     versus

                                  MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
                                  & ORS.                                              ..... Respondent
                                                     Through:      Mr. Chetanya Singh and Mr. Chetan
                                                                   Sharma, Advocates for R-1/MCD
                          %
                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
                                                     JUDGMENT

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

CM APPL. 50439/2023 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1604/2023 & CM APPL. 50438/2023

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 02.09.2023 passed by (Principal District & Session Judge West District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi ('Appellate Court') allowing the impleadment application of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein. 1.1. The Petitioner Nos. 1-3 herein are respondent nos.1-3 before the Appellate Court. The Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were the applicant before the Appellate Court.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed By:Mahima Sharma Signing Date:27.09.2023 20:49:36

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Appellate Court did not take into account the fact that the Petitioners herein have submitted an application for sanction of building plan for third floor which excludes the servant room under the occupation of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. He states that therefore, the Petitioners herein are not seeking to affect in any manner the rights of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2.1 He states that he has apprehensions that the observations made by the Appellate Court in impugned order 02.09.2023 should not influence the final outcome of the appeal as admittedly the title of the parties is not a subject matter in these proceedings. He further states that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have also filed an independent appeal against the order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation Delhi ('ATMCD').

3. This Court has perused the impugned order dated 02.09.2023 and heard the counsel for the parties.

4. The learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 has entered appearance. None appears for the remaining Respondents.

5. In view of the observations made by the Appellate Court in the impugned order, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order does not require any interference except for clarifying that the Appellate Court at the time of the final disposal will duly consider the effect of the Petitioner's building plan submitted for third floor, which excludes the servant room under the occupation of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. It is needless to state that the final determination in the appeal will be uninfluenced by any observation made by the Appellate Court in the impugned order dated 02.09.2023; as all observations in the impugned order are only for the limited purpose of adjudicating upon the application of impleadment of Respondent Nos. 2 and

3. The said impugned order is not an expression on the merits of the claims Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed By:Mahima Sharma Signing Date:27.09.2023 20:49:36 of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

7. Pending application stands disposed of.

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2023/msh/sk Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed By:Mahima Sharma Signing Date:27.09.2023 20:49:36

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter