Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ministry Of Railway & Ors. vs Shri Salim Ahmed Khan & Ors.
2023 Latest Caselaw 918 Del

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 918 Del
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2023

Delhi High Court
Ministry Of Railway & Ors. vs Shri Salim Ahmed Khan & Ors. on 3 July, 2023
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                            Date of Decision: July 03, 2023
                          24
                          +     W.P.(C) 8746/2023 & CM APPLs. 33017/2023, 33018/2023 &
                                33019/2023

                                MINISTRY OF RAILWAY & ORS.              ..... Petitioners
                                              Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC for UOI.

                                                   versus

                                SHRI SALIM AHMED KHAN & ORS.            ..... Respondents
                                             Through: Mr. Manjeet Singh Reen, Advocate.


                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
                          V. KAMESWAR RAO (Oral)

                          CM APPL. Nos. 33018/2023 and CM APPL. 33019/2023

                          1.    Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
                          2.    Applications stand disposed of.
                          W.P.(C) 8746/2023 & CM APPL. No. 33017/2023
                          3.    The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated July 15, 2021 in
                          Original Application being O.A. 1511/2020 ('OA', for short) passed by the
                          Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi and also to the
                          order dated February 08, 2023 in Review Application 66/2021 in O.A.
                          1511/2020.




                          W.P.(C) 8746/2023                                                   Page 1 of 3
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:DINESH CHANDRA
Signing Date:06.07.2023
16:56:52
                           4.    Vide an order dated July 15, 2020, the Tribunal has allowed a batch of
                          OAs, which includes O.A. 1511/2020 by stating in paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10
                          as under:
                                      "7· Be that as it may, once the various benches of the
                                      Tribunal, the Hon'ble High Courts and the Hon'ble
                                      Supreme Court held that the increment, which became
                                      due on 1st July or 1st January as the case may be, needs
                                      to be released for the employees, who retired one day
                                      earlier thereto, the applicants herein cannot be denied
                                      such benefit.

                                      8. To protect the interests of the respondents, we direct
                                      that in case any different view is taken by the Hon'ble
                                      Supreme Court in SLP No. 4722/2021, the applicants
                                      shall be under obligation to refund the benefit that is
                                      extended to them. In the corresponding orders, a clause
                                      can be incorporated to that effect.

                                      9. We make it clear that extension of benefit of increment
                                      shall be subject to their fulfilling other conditions under
                                      the relevant service rules.

                                      10. For the foregoing reasons, the OAs are allowed,
                                      directing that:

                                        (a) for such of the employees who retired on 30th June
                                        of any particular year, increment payable on 1st July
                                        shall be extended. Their pensions shall also be revised,
                                        subject to their fulfilling other conditions which are
                                        applicable. The arrears that become due shall be paid
                                        without interest;
                                        (b) Similarly for employees, who retired on 31st
                                        December of a particular year, the increment payable
                                        on the 1st January of the next year shall be extended
                                        and pension revised, subject to same conditions in the
                                        same manner.


                          W.P.(C) 8746/2023                                                 Page 2 of 3
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:DINESH CHANDRA
Signing Date:06.07.2023
16:56:52
                                          (c) While extending such benefits, a clause shall be
                                         incorporated to the effect that in case the Hon'ble
                                         Supreme takes a different view in the Civil Appeal
                                         arising out of SLP No. 4722j2021, they shall be under
                                         obligation to refund the entire benefit without any
                                         demur.
                                      The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a
                                      period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy
                                      of this order.
                                      Pending MAs shall also stand disposed of. There shall be
                                      no order as to costs."

                          5.    Learned counsel for the parties concede to the fact that the issue in
                          hand is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The
                          Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Versus C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.,
                          Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023, decided on April 11, 2023.
                          6.    If that be so, the Writ Petition is disposed of by stating that the parties
                          shall be bound by the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Director
                          (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. (supra).
                          7.    Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a plea that the cost as has
                          been imposed by the Tribunal while deciding the review application, be
                          waived. We find that the cost imposed has been directed to be deposited in
                          the Prime Minister's Relief Fund. If that be so, we do not see any reason to
                          waive the same.



                                                                             V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JULY 03, 2023/akc

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:06.07.2023 16:56:52

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter