Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1038 Del
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2023
#S-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment Delivered On: 07.07.2023
W.P.(C) 8971/2023
MOHD. OWAIS ....Petitioner
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ....Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC along with Ms. Harshita
Gupta and Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocates for
R-1/NDMC.
Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD along
with Mr. Jatin Dua, Advocate for R-2/Delhi Police.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
JUDGMENT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (OPEN COURT)
CM APPL. 34022/2023 (Exemption) & CM APPL. 34080/2023 (Exemption) Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of accordingly. Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:DURGESH NANDAN Signing Date:11.07.2023 17:18:38 W.P.(C) 8971/2023
1. The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:-
"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to :-
a) Direct the respondent for the transferring of vending site of deceased Late Mohd. Ahmed on the name of petitioner as the petitioner was first legal heir of deceased as the petitioner's Father was found in the list of 628 at serial no. 164.
b) Direct the respondent no.l for survey the petitioner as the petitioner's father was the existing vendor of NDMC area.
c) Direct the Town Vending Committee (Respondent No.1) to consider the representation dated 26/06/2023 in accordance with law.
d) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction or Pass such other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. Issue notice.
3. Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel
accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1/New Delhi Municipal
Council (NDMC) and Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, learned Panel Counsel
accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 2/Delhi Police.
4. The petitioner limits the relief in the present petition, seeking
liberty to approach the concerned Town Vending Committee (TVC) of
the area along with the relevant documents for appropriate relief i.e.
substitution of his name, instead of that of his deceased father, Mr. Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:DURGESH NANDAN Signing Date:11.07.2023 17:18:38 Mohd. Ahmed, who had featured at Serial No. 164 in the list of 628
vendors, prepared by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) in the
year 2012.
5. Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel
appearing on behalf of the NDMC states that, they do not oppose the
limited relief, as extracted hereinabove, for the reason that the NDMC
itself has asked the petitioner herein, to do precisely that.
6. In view of the foregoing, the limited relief prayed for, on behalf of
the petitioner, as afore-extracted is granted, permitting him to take
necessary steps in accordance with law.
7. No further relief is prayed for.
8. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
9. Copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE)
GAURANG KANTH (JUDGE) JULY 07, 2023/rs
Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:DURGESH NANDAN Signing Date:11.07.2023 17:18:38
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!