Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Subros Educational Society vs Union Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 1627 Del

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1627 Del
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2022

Delhi High Court
M/S Subros Educational Society vs Union Of India on 19 May, 2022
                                                          Signature Not Verified
                                                          Digitally Signed
                                                          By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
                                                          Signing Date:20.05.2022
                                                          17:37:48


$~5
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    Date of decision: 19th May, 2022
+               C.A. (COMM.IPD-TM) 1/2021
       M/S SUBROS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY              ..... APPELLANT
                      Through: Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ananya
                               Marwah and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh,
                               Advocates. (M:9810520379)
                      versus
       UNION OF INDIA                        .....RESPONDENT

Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Ms. Bushra S. Kazim and Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Advocates.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Appellant - M/S. SUBROS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned order dated 15 th February, 2019 passed by the Senior Examiner, Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi. By the said order, the mark 'Step By Step High School', applied for by the Appellant, vide Trademark Application bearing No.2891488 in Class 41, has been refused registration, under Sections 9 & 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The operative portion of the order dated 15 th February, 2019 is set out below:

"With reference to the above and request on Form TM-M dated 09/02/2019. It has been decided by the Registrar of Trademarks to inform you that hearing in respect of above application was held on 26/12/2018 and the said application is refused on the following Grounds:

* The applicant advocate Ranjan Jha appeared. I

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEVANSHU JOSHI Signing Date:20.05.2022 17:37:48

have heard the argument and also perused the documents available on record. The same and similar mark is already on record, hence, objection under Section 9 and 11 is sustained, application is refused for registration."

3. The details of the trademark Application bearing No.2891488 in Class 41 relating to the mark 'Step By Step High School' is set out below:

4. A perusal of the above order shows that the same is for 'Step By Step High School', which is a variant of the Appellant's registered trademark. The Appellant has several similar registrations, such as "Step By Step" bearing No.1301297, as well as "Step By Step School" bearing No.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEVANSHU JOSHI Signing Date:20.05.2022 17:37:48

1549619.

5. The mark 'Step By Step' has been used by the Appellant in respect of educational services since the year 1990. The said mark has been used as a name of the play school as also higher levels of schooling and has acquired goodwill and reputation. It is submitted by Mr. Bhasin, ld. Counsel for the Appellant that in view of the expansion of its branches in other fields of educational services, the mark "Step By Step High School" was applied for.

6. Accordingly, the rejection of the said mark, in the face of the earlier registrations in the name of the Appellant for the mark 'Step by Step', as also the long user, is unsustainable. The impugned order dated 15th February, 2019 is, accordingly, set aside.

7. The application bearing No.2891488 for the registration of the mark 'Step By Step High School' shall proceed for advertisement in the trademark journal. The said mark shall be advertised within a period of four months. If there is any opposition to the said trademark application, the opposition shall be decided in accordance with law, without being effected by any of the observations made in the present order.

8. Let the present order be served upon the Respondent - Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi, through Mr, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, ld. CGSC.

9. The present appeal is allowed and disposed of, in the above terms. All pending applications are also disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE MAY 19, 2022/dk/ss

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter