Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United Telecoms Ltd vs Bharat Broadband Network Ltd
2022 Latest Caselaw 465 Del

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 465 Del
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2022

Delhi High Court
United Telecoms Ltd vs Bharat Broadband Network Ltd on 14 February, 2022
$~20
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                            Date of decision: 14.02.2022
+      O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 23/2022 & IA No. 2446/2022
       UNITED TELECOMS LTD.                            ..... Petitioner
                    Through:          Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Gaurav
                                      Pathak &Mr. Rajesh Chettri,
                                      Advocates

                           Versus

       BHARAT BROADBAND NETWORK LTD.         ..... Respondent
                   Through: Mr. Chandan N. Kamra, Advocate

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

                          J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section

15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of

a Sole Arbitrator in substitution.

2. For adjudication of the disputes with respondent, this Court by order

dated 25.04.2019 [ in OMP. (I) (COMM) No. 125/2019] had appointed Mr.

Justice (Retd.) Jagannadha Rao, the sole Arbitrator. According to petitioner,

the learned Arbitrator had to adjudicate two cases APO-I and APO-II. The

arbitral proceedings in respect of APO-II stood concluded and the arbitration

award was rendered on 06.06.2021 and 07.07.2021 in respect thereof.

However, arguments in APO-I though commenced but could not be

completed owing to illness of the Counsel and restraints of covid pandemic.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that an email dated

21.09.2021 has been received from the learned sole arbitrator wherein he has

expressed his inability to hear the arguments in APO-I and, therefore, the

present petition has been filed seeking appointment of a substituted

Arbitrator.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Chandan N. Kamra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of

respondent.

6. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the case is at the advance

stage of hearing arguments and this Court may appoint sole Arbitrator and

also grant one year time to the arbitral tribunal for preparing and

pronouncing the Award. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly

proposed the name of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal for appointment as

the sole Arbitrator.

7. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. At the joint

request of counsel representing both the sides, Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul

Mudgal, former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, is

appointed sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The

tribunal is granted one year time from today to hear the arguments and

render the Award.

8. The learned Arbitrator shall decide the fee after consultation with the

parties.

9. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

Needless to say, all issues are left open for adjudication and consideration by

the learned Arbitrator.

10. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.

11. The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 14, 2022 r

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter