Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M. A. Khan vs Union Of India And Ors.
2021 Latest Caselaw 887 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 887 Del
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2021

Delhi High Court
M. A. Khan vs Union Of India And Ors. on 16 March, 2021
$~A-17
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      W.P. (C) 1923/2020, CM APPL. 6734/2020
       M.A. KHAN                                       .....Petitioner
                         Through:     Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate.

                         Versus
       UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                 .....Respondents
                     Through: Mr.Rajan Sabharwal with
                               Mr.Raghav Sabharwal, Advocates.

%                                     Date of Decision: 16th March, 2021
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
                       JUDGMENT

MANMOHAN, J (Oral):

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Force Order dated 11th February, 2020 whereby petitioner has been transferred from RPF Post ANVT/DLI to Kashmir Valley. Petitioner also seeks directions to the respondents to continue posting of petitioner at RPF Post ANVT/DLI or grant any other soft posting to petitioner commensurate with his medical condition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in 2015, petitioner developed weakness and numbness of both upper and lower limbs which was insidious in onset and progressive in nature. She further states that pursuant thereto, a Medical Board was constituted that opined that petitioner is unfit for job of Head Constable/RPF due to his physical

disability but fit in his original medical category Bee-one vision wise and therefore, the Medical Board recommended that petitioner may be given alternative employment on medical grounds in medical category Bee-one and below where running/field activity is not required. The relevant portion of last Medical Board recommendation dated 14th March, 2016 is reproduced hereinbelow:-

"NORTHERN RAILWAY

No - 54-Med/MB/MAK/DLI/2016 Division Hospital, Dt: 14.03.16 Delhi

The Assistant Security Commissioner, Railway Protection force, Anand Vihar Subject: Medical Board of Sh. Mawassar Ali Khan S/o Sh. Hasmat Khan, working as Hd. Constable under ASC/RPF/ANVR.

Reference: CHD's letter No. 99-Med/MB/MAK/1848 dated 08.03.16.

The recommendations of the Medical Board in favour of the above named employee duly accepted by the CMD/Northern Railway/New Delhi on 03.03.16 are reproduced below:- Recommendations:- In view of above, the members of the Divisional Medical Committee are of the opinion that Sh. Mawassar Ali Khan S/o Sh. Hasmat Khan, working as Hd. Constable under ASC/RPF/ANVR is unfit for his present job of Hd. Constable/RPF due to physical disability mentioned above. But fit in his original medical category Bee-one vision wise. It is recommended that he may be given an alternative employment on medical grounds in medical category Bee-one & below where running/field activity is not required.

Sd/-

(Dr. Mool Narayan) Chief Medical Superintendent Delhi...."

3. She points out that the petitioner was working on a supernumerary post and posted as Head Constable, Anand Vihar pending grant of suitable alternative employment to him.

4. She emphasises that instead of granting alternative employment to the petitioner, respondents transferred the petitioner from his supernumerary post of Head Constable Post, Anand Vihar Delhi to hard posting of Kashmir Valley, which is not justifiable.

5. Per contra, Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, learned counsel for the respondents states that as per Rule 90 of RPF Rules, 1987, transfer can be ordered for administrative reasons. He states that in the present case, the transfer was on administrative grounds inasmuch as the petitioner was found involved in malfeasance/questionable activities along with other Head Constable Mahesh Chand & Inspector Kishan Singh Rawat. He points out that these officers were suspended, issued major penalty chargesheet and thereafter the charges were proved against them. He emphasizes that the inquiry report has not been challenged by the petitioner till date.

6. Keeping in view the foresaid as well as the fact that transfer is an exigency of service, this Court rejects the prayer for stay of the transfer order of the petitioner to Kashmir Valley. However, the respondents are directed to give posting to the petitioner in Kashmir in accordance with the last Medical Board recommendation dated 14th March, 2016.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition along with pending application stand disposed of.

MANMOHAN, J

ASHA MENON, J MARCH 16, 2021 KA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter