Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hindustan Construction Company ... vs Ircon International Limited
2021 Latest Caselaw 747 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 747 Del
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2021

Delhi High Court
Hindustan Construction Company ... vs Ircon International Limited on 3 March, 2021
                          $~7
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                                 Decided on 3rd March, 2021
                          +     O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 36/2021
                                HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION
                                COMPANY LIMITED                     ..... Petitioner
                                            Through     Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr.
                                            Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrala and Ms.
                                            Shruti Arora, Advs.

                                                   versus

                                IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED         ..... Respondent
                                             Through    Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhyay, Sr.
                                             Advocate with Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr.
                                             Prakhar Deep, Mr. Mahendra Gupta and Ms.
                                             Aashna Chawla, Advs.
                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C .HARI SHANKAR

                                                   O R D E R (ORAL)

% 03.03.2021 (Video-Conferencing)

IA 3279/2021 (Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay)

1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned.

2. The application stands disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 36/2021

1. This is a petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "1996 Act"), seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Signing Date:06.03.2021 19:17:42 on the disputes between the parties. The mandate expired on 4th February, 2021.

2. Mr. Wadhwa, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, draws my attention to the email dated 18th January, 2021, from the learned Presiding Arbitrator, which reads thus:

"From: Badar Ahmed <[email protected]> Sent: 18 January 2021 12:18 To: NAIK Gurudas /CONTRACTS & CLAIMS/H.O. <[email protected]>; [email protected] com; Mirza, Gauhar<[email protected]>; Pragya Chauhan <pragya [email protected]>; KUMAR Rakesh /CONTRACTS&CLAIMS/H.O.<[email protected] om>; Sidharth Sethi <[email protected]>; Harsh Khare <[email protected]>; Mukesh Kumar <[email protected]>; Kumar Ravi Shankar <[email protected]>;Karia,Tejas<[email protected] ul.com>; Deep, Prakhar <[email protected]>; Gupta, Hirai <[email protected]>; Gupta, Manavendra <[email protected] corn>

Cc: BP Khare <[email protected] com>; SURESH KUMAR <[email protected]>

Subject: Arbitration BETWEEN Hindustan Construction Company Limited AND IRCON International Ltd

Dear All,

The Hon'ble High Court had extended the time for making the award till 04.02.2021 by virtue of its order dated 06.11.2020. However, discussions could not be concluded till after the first week of January 2021 as, Mr. Bhuvnesh Prakash Khare, a member of the Arbitral Tribunal was indisposed. The discussions amongst the members of the Arbitral Tribunal have now been finally held through videoconferencing and the award is at the stage of finalisation. In all likelihood the proceedings would be completed on or before 04.02.2021.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Signing Date:06.03.2021 19:17:42 However, since the arbitrators are located in three different cities, the signing at three different locations and consequent postal communications would also take some time. Accordingly, to be on the safe side, the parties may apply for extension of time till the end of February, 2021for making the award.

Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed (retd) Presiding Arbitrator"

3. It appears, therefore, that the award is on the cusp of pronouncement.

4. Mr. Mukhopadhyay, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, submits that he has no objection to extension of time as sought, but that the learned Arbitral Tribunal may be directed to provide another opportunity of "refresher hearing" to his client, given the time that has lapsed since the award was reserved.

5. Mr. Wadhwa points out that a request, to this effect, was made and was rejected by the learned Presiding Arbitrator on 7th December, 2020.

6. In view thereof, I am not inclined to accede to the request for the learned Arbitral Tribunal to give a "refresher hearing" to the respondent, especially as the afore-extracted email from the Hon'ble Presiding Member of the learned Arbitral Tribunal seems to indicate that the award is likely to be pronounced soon.

7. In view thereof, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal stands extended by a period of three months from today. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Signing Date:06.03.2021 19:17:42

8. This petition stands disposed of.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J MARCH 3, 2021 r.bararia

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Signing Date:06.03.2021 19:17:42

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter