Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Gpt-Rahee (Jv) vs M/S Ircon International Ltd.
2021 Latest Caselaw 52 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 52 Del
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Delhi High Court
M/S Gpt-Rahee (Jv) vs M/S Ircon International Ltd. on 7 January, 2021
                          $~4 (Original Side)
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 7/2021 & I.A. 194/2021
                                M/S GPT-RAHEE (JV)                            ..... Petitioner
                                              Through:           Mr. Ranjit Prakash, Mr.
                                                                 Anshuman Pande, Ms. Gaurika
                                                                 Mohan & Ms. Vishalakshi
                                                                 Singh
                                                    versus

                                M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.      ..... Respondent
                                              Through: Mr. Suman K Doval, Adv.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

                                             ORDER
                          %                  07.01.2021
                                       (Video-Conferencing)


1. This is an application under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "1996 Act"). The arbitration, to which the application relates, and pertaining to the disputes between the parties to this application, was being conducted by Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. K. Sikri, an eminent retired Judge of the Supreme Court and a former Judge of this court.

2. The learned Arbitrator passed his award, in the arbitral proceedings, on 19th December, 2020. Section 33(1)(a) allows the parties, to any arbitral proceedings, to move an application for correction, before the learned arbitral tribunal, within 30 days of the receipt of the arbitral award. Section 33(2) grants 30 days' time to the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI

10:34:29 arbitral tribunal to consider the request made under Section 33(1)(a) and to pass orders thereof. The petitioner received the arbitral award, passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, on 19th December, 2020. An application under Section 33(1)(a), was preferred by the petitioner on 28th December, 2020, admittedly within the time available under Section 33(1)(a). Unfortunately, before the application could be decided and, even before the expiry of 30 days available under section 33 (2) for the learned Arbitrator to decide the application, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator expired on 1st January, 2021.

3. It is in these circumstances that the present application has been preferred, by the claimant before the learned Arbitrator, to grant extension of time under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the 1996 Act so that the learned Arbitrator could decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section 33(1)(a).

4. Mr. Suman Doval, learned counsel for the respondent, in all fairness, does not oppose the request, though he submits that the issue of whether extension of time, for deciding an application under Section 33(1)(a), can be granted under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the 1996 Act, may require adjudication in an appropriate case.

5. Prima facie, in my view, Section 29A(4) and (5) would also apply to grant of extension of time, in order to enable an arbitral tribunal to decide an application under Section 33(1)(a), as otherwise, in a case such as the present, the Section 33(1)(a) applicant, despite

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI

10:34:29 having preferred the application before the learned Arbitrator in time, would be divested of the right to have the application decided.

6. In any event, as Mr. Suman Doval fairly agrees to extension of time for the learned Arbitrator to decide the application of the petitioner under Section 33(1)(a), the time available with the learned Arbitrator stands extended by a period of two months, with effect from 1st January, 2021.

7. This petition stands allowed accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JANUARY 7, 2021/ss

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI

10:34:29

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter