Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Archit Sharma vs Central Reserve Police Force And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3514 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3514 Del
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Delhi High Court
Archit Sharma vs Central Reserve Police Force And ... on 17 December, 2021
                          $~77
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                                    Date of Decision: 17.12.2021

                          +      W.P.(C) 13138/2021 & CM APPL. 41430/2021
                                 ARCHIT SHARMA                         ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through: Mr.Amit Kaushik & Ms.Bhateri
                                                           Devi, Advs.

                                                     versus

                                 CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE AND ORS
                                                                     ..... Respondents
                                              Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC
                                                       for UOI with Dr.Amarnath
                                                       Kumar, CRPF, DC/SMO &
                                                       Dr.Naishadh J. Jivrajani, BSF,
                                                       DC.

                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

                                 NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner had applied for the 'Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination, 2019'.

2. The petitioner was declared unfit for appointment during the Detailed Medical Examination on the following grounds:-

1. Overweight 3.5 kg

2. Chronic dermatitis of buttocks and back area

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34

3. Cubitus Valgus

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was thereafter referred to the Jawahar Lal Nehru Hospital, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as 'JLN Hospital') for further examination. The petitioner contends that during such examination, the petitioner was found to be medically fit. The petitioner contends that inspite of the said report finding the petitioner to be medically fit, the petitioner was again declared medically unfit on the ground of 'Cubitus Valgus' by the Review Medical Examination Board.

4. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.12.2021, the respondents have produced before us the original medical record of the petitioner. The doctors who constituted the Review Medical Board are also present in the Court today.

5. Upon perusal of the medical record, we find that the petitioner was referred to JLN Hospital for an opinion from an Orthopaedic on 'Cubitus Valgus'. There is also a certificate dated 23.10.2021 issued by the JLN Hospital, opining the petitioner to be fit orthopedically fit.

6. The doctors present in Court explain that they had carried out a goniometry test on the petitioner, which does not seem to have been carried out by the doctors at JLN Hospital. They submit that for this reason the opinion of the JLN Hospital cannot be relied upon.

7. Be that as it may, as we have an opinion from the JLN Hospital which declares the petitioner to be orthopedically fit, in the peculiar facts of the present case, we are of the opinion that petitioner should

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34 be examined by the Army R&R Hospital, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'R&R Hospital') for his alleged Cubitus Valgus. For this purpose, the respondent shall request the R&R Hospital to constitute a Board of doctors consisting of a specialist Orthopaedic and give an appointment to the petitioner for being examined within a period of ten days from today. The report of the R&R Hospital shall be considered as final, with no party being allowed to challenge the same. The respondent shall act upon the appointment application of the petitioner in accordance with the report that is received from the R&R Hospital within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the report. The report received from the R&R Hospital shall also be shared with the petitioner.

8. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.

9. The original medical record of the petitioner is returned back to the respondents.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

MANMOHAN, J

DECEMBER 17, 2021/rv

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter