Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gaurav Kumar Bansal vs National Tiger Conservation ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2256 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2256 Del
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Delhi High Court
Gaurav Kumar Bansal vs National Tiger Conservation ... on 23 August, 2021
                          $~26
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                         Date of Decision: 23rd August, 2021

                          +        W.P.(C) 8729/2021

                                   GAURAV KUMAR BANSAL                     ..... Petitioner
                                              Through  Petitioner in person
                                                      versus
                                   NATIONAL TIGER CONSERVATION
                                   AUTHORITY                                          ..... Respondent
                                                Through: None
                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                   HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
                                                                JUDGMENT

D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing. CM APPLS. 27182/2021 & 27185/2021 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of.

CM APPL.27183/2021 (Exemption from filing notarized affidavit) For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file duly signed and affirmed affidavit within a period of one week from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court.

Application is disposed of.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:25.08.2021 23:22:46 CM APPL.27184/2021 (Exemption from filing court fees) For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file the requisite Court fee within a period of 72 hours from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 8729/2021 & CM APPL. 27181/2021 (Direction)

1. Present Public Interest Litigation has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

"A. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction to National Tiger Conservation Authority to use its power under section 38 (O)

(b) of the Wildlife Protection Act and to disallow the illegal construction of bridges and walls within Tiger Breeding Habitat of Corbett Tiger Reserve as the same is in violation of Section 38 (O) (g) of the Wildlife Protection Act - 1972. B. Pass any other directions or orders as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court."

2. The principal grievance highlighted in the present petition is the alleged illegal construction of bridges and walls within the Tiger Breeding Habitat of Corbett Tiger Reserve and that too, without the approval from the Respondent herein under Section 38 (O) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Petitioner, thus, seeks intervention of this Court to protect and conserve the Biological Diversity, flora and fauna as well as the ecology of the Corbett National Park.

3. The Petitioner submits that a legal notice was sent to the Respondent on 11.08.2021 to take necessary action and stop the illegal construction activities, however, there has been no response or action.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:25.08.2021 23:22:46

4. We have heard the Petitioner. Looking to the averments in the writ petition and the provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, more particularly, Section 38(O)(b) thereof, we deem it appropriate, at this stage, to direct the Respondent to treat this writ petition as a Representation and look into the issues flagged and highlighted by the Petitioner. Needless to state that in case the Respondent finds merit in the issues raised, necessary action shall be taken by the Respondent, in accordance with law, keeping in mind the provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and the necessity of conserving the flora and fauna as well as the ecology of the National Park. For the purpose of taking a decision and consequential action, if any, it is open to the Respondent to call for an inspection report, in order to verify the factual status with respect to the allegations made in the writ petition. The exercise shall be carried out by the Respondent as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

5. In case the Petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision taken, it is open to the Petitioner to resort to appropriate remedies available in law.

6. With these observations, writ petition along with pending application is hereby disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

JYOTI SINGH, J AUGUST 23, 2021/rk

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:25.08.2021 23:22:46

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter