Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anti Corruption Council Of India ... vs The Head Of The Department ...
2020 Latest Caselaw 2740 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 2740 Del
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2020

Delhi High Court
Anti Corruption Council Of India ... vs The Head Of The Department ... on 28 September, 2020
                             $~28
                             *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                             %                                Date of Decision: 28th September, 2020

                             +      W.P.(C) 11644/2019 & CM APPL. 7893/2020 (for directions)

                                    ANTI CORRUPTION COUNCIL OF INDIA
                                    THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
                                    MOHD KAMRAN KHAN                           ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through: Mr.Z.U.Khan, Advocate

                                                  Versus

                                    THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
                                    DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES AND ANR.              ..... Respondents
                                                  Through: Mr.Chetan Sharma, ASG with
                                                  Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC, Mr.Syed
                                                  Husain Adil Taqvi, GP, Mr.Waiz Ali Noor,
                                                  Advocate with Ms.Ritu Sain from Deptt.of Estate
                                                  for UOI.
                                                  Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr.Naman Jain,
                                                  Advocate for GNCTD.
                                    CORAM:
                                    HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                             JUDGMENT

: D.N.PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submitted that with regard to 565 Government accommodations which were unauthorizedly occupied, all have been vacated, except those where stay of the competent Court is operating. It is also submitted that, until now, ₹3.17 crores have been

Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:

Signing Date:07.10.2020 10:23:51 recovered from the unauthorized occupants. However, an amount of ₹9.40 crores is yet to be recovered and all efforts are being made for expeditious recovery. Paragraphs 8 and 10 of the affidavit dated 31st August, 2020 read as under:-

"8. That it is respectfully submitted that out of the 565 flats, listed in Annexure-2 to the Affidavit filed on 21.11.2019 as under unauthorized occupation by the officials, the status of vacation of the accommodation by the officials are as under: -

S.NO. STATUS Nos. as on Nos. as on Nos. as on 05.02.2020 19.06.2020 25.08.2020

vacated

Re-allotted / Retention given / Date of Retirement extended

respect of which litigation is pending in various Courts with stay

occupied by Kashmiri Migrants [The policy pertaining to Kashmiri Migrants is under examination by this Hon‟ble Court in W.P. 3908/2018 and this Hon‟ble Court has been pleased to grant a

Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:

Signing Date:07.10.2020
10:23:51
                                              stay     to     the
                                             Petitioners therein
                                             vide order dated
                                             20.04.2018]

                                             identified      in
                                             Department Pool

                                             respect of which
                                             Eviction orders /
                                             Notices have been
                                             passed / issued as
                                             per the Public
                                             Premises (Eviction
                                             of    Unauthorized
                                             Occupants)     Act,
                                             1971.


                                                     xxxx     xxxx         xxxx         xxxx

10. That it is respectfully submitted that as per the Government Accommodation Management System (GAMS) an amount of Rs.24.78 crore approx. was due against 565 officials on 21.11.2019. However, after 21.11.2019, additional damages to the tune of Rs.4.45 crore accumulated. Thus, total dues to be recovered are Rs.29.23 crore. Thereafter, with efforts made by the Directorate of Estates, as mentioned in para 8 above, the dues against the officials are updated in the cases of retention/regularisation, re-allotment, rectification in date of possession/vacation and reconciliation of Department Pool and houses under litigation. The dues of Rs.29.23 crore has got reduced to Rs.12.57 crore. Out of this, Rs.3.17 crore has been recovered. Thus, now the dues to be recovered as on date are Rs.9.40 crore approximately for which all efforts are being made for fast recovery."

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 further submitted that notices

Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:

Signing Date:07.10.2020 10:23:51 have already been issued for recovery of the outstanding amount; however, in a few matters, stay has been granted by the competent Court. The concerned advocates have been instructed for preferring necessary applications for vacation of stay so that the outstanding amount involved in such cases can also be recovered.

3. In view of these facts, as the accommodations have now been vacated and only outstanding amount is to be recovered, we expect from the concerned respondent-authorities that they shall continue to take steps for the recovery of the amounts due from the aforesaid unauthorized occupants. We also expect from the respondents that henceforth, if any Government servant retires, he/she should not be allowed to occupy the Government accommodations for a longer period than that permitted under the relevant Rules. We also expect from the respondents that the legally payable amount in such cases shall be recovered at the earliest.

4. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 „hkaur‟

Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:

Signing Date:07.10.2020 10:23:51

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter