Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sandeep Jolly & Anr. vs State & Anr.
2020 Latest Caselaw 3069 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 3069 Del
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2020

Delhi High Court
Sandeep Jolly & Anr. vs State & Anr. on 9 November, 2020
$~11
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                        Date of decision: 9th November, 2020
+      CRL.M.C. 2150/2020
       SANDEEP JOLLY & ANR.                              ..... Petitioners

                          Through       Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv.

                          versus

       STATE & ANR.                                      ..... Respondents

                          Through       Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
                                        with SI Mohit Malik, PS Mayapuri
                                        Mr. D.K. Singh, Adv. for R-2 with
                                        R-2 in person

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing. CRL. M.A. 15349/2020

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.2150/2020

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for

quashing of FIR No.0194/2018 dated 04.09.2018, registered at PS -

Mayapuri, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for

respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present

petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled

their disputes and respondent No.2 have no objection if the present petition

is allowed.

7. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel

and he has been identified by SI Mohit Malik/IO and submits that matter has

been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. Petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable

settlement.

9. Learned APP has opposed the present petition and submits that due to

the registration of FIR, government machinery came in motion and a lot of

precious public time has been consumed, therefore, if this Court is inclined

to quash FIR, heavy cost may be imposed upon petitioners.

10. Learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions from petitioners, who

are present in Court through video conferencing, has come forward and

agreed to contribute an amount of Rs.25,000/- by each petitioner for welfare

purposes. Accordingly, petitioners are directed to pay this amount in the

following manner:-

(a) Petitioner no.1 is directed to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- in

favour of Delhi Police Martyrs Fund;

(b) Petitioner no.2 is directed to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- in

favour of Bharat ke Veer.

11. Petitioners are directed to pay this amount within one week from

today and receipt of the same shall be furnished to IO concerned.

12. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any

further.

13. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.0194/2018 dated 04.09.2018,

registered at PS - Mayapuri, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating

therefrom are quashed.

14. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

15. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER 09, 2020/rk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter