Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1646 Del
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2020
$~56
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 16.03.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 1423/2020
ANOOP BISWAS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Vijay Shankar Tiwari, Adv. along
with petitioner.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Izhar Ahmed, APP for State.
SI Rajeshwar, PS Palam Village
Mr. Gaurav Chowdhary, Adv. for R-2
with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 5480/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 1423/2020
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction for
quashing of FIR No. 290/2017 dated 16.08.2017 registered at Police Station
Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for
respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition
is taken up for final disposal.
6. Petitioner and respondent no.2 got married on 20.01.2012 as per
Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Ishan
Biswas on 25.12.2012. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioner
and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 18.08.2016.
7. Petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the
Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi vide
settlement deed dated 08.02.2019 and in the settlement deed, petitioner had
agreed to pay a total sum of ₹5,00,000/- to respondent no.2 and settled all
their disputes amicably.
8. A demand draft bearing No.117615 dated 11.02.2020 for the balance
amount of ₹1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lac Fifty Thousand Only) is handed
over to the respondent no. 2 today in the Court.
9. Complainant is present in person and has been identified by SI
Rajeshwar of Police Station Palam Village and submits that matter has been
settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any
further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 290/2017 dated 16.08.2017
registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
13. Order dasti
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE MARCH 16, 2020 ms
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!