Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1565 Del
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2020
$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision:11.03.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 1342/2020
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. .... Petitioners
Through Mr.Aayushmaan Vatsyayana, Adv.
with petitioners in person
versus
STATE & ANR. .... Respondents
Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
with SI Sandeep Kumar and Insp.
Mahender Singh Dahiya, SHO, PS
Vikaspuri
Ms.Archana Sharma, Adv. for R-2
with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 5172/2020 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.1342/2020
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of
FIR No. 21/2013 dated 18.01.2013 registered at Police Station Vikaspuri,
Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by learned counsel
for respondent No.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for
parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. Son of petitioner No.1, namely Rinku Verma and respondent No.2 got
married on 28.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. On 28.09.2011, the
husband of respondent No.2 expired. Due to extreme incompatibilities
between petitioners and respondent No.2, they started living separately from
02.10.2011
7. Mother-in-law of respondent No.2, namely Daulat Devi and
respondent No.2 have entered into an amicable settlement before the Delhi
Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated
21.08.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹12,00,000/-(Rupees Twelve Lakhs
only). It is submitted that respondent No. 2 has already received an amount
of ₹9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs only). A demand draft bearing
No.724824 dated 09.03.2020 for the balance amount of ₹3,00,000/- (Rupees
Three Lakhs only) is handed over to respondent No.2 today in Court.
9. Respondent No.2 is present in person and has been identified by SI
Sandeep Kumar (IO) and submits that matter has been settled and she does
not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the present FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting
petitioners any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 21/2013 dated 18.01.2013
registered at Police Station Vikaspuri, Delhi and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
13. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE MARCH 11, 2020/rk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!