Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Rai vs Delhi Development Authority
2020 Latest Caselaw 2082 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 2082 Del
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2020

Delhi High Court
Rajesh Rai vs Delhi Development Authority on 1 July, 2020
                                                                                          SINDHU KRISHNAKUMAR

                                                                                          03.07.2020 17:42


                                $~9
                                *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                                             Date of Decision: 1st July, 2020
                                +                         W.P.(C) 3720/2020
                                       RAJESH RAI                                               ..... Petitioner
                                                          Through:     Petitioner in person.

                                                          versus

                                       DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY               ..... Respondent
                                                    Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta and Ms.
                                                             Nihaarika    Jauhari,      Advocates.
                                                             (M:9873367274)

                                       CORAM:
                                       JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

                                Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been held through video conferencing.

CRL.M.A. 13335/2020 (for issuance of ad interim order)

2. The Delhi Development Authority ("DDA") issued a public notice for E-Auction of Expandable Housing Plots Properties on an "as is where is basis". The Petitioner registered for the said auction, paid the first tranche of the earnest money deposit and submitted the requisite documents. He was one of the successful bidders for Plot No.578, Pocket-3, Sector-19, Dwarka, Delhi. According to the Petitioner, LOI ("Letter of Intent") was to be issued by the DDA giving details of the procedure for deposit of the further amount.

3. The Petitioner received the LOI dated 17th June, 2020 on 18th June,

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40 2020. According to Mr. Rajesh Rai, the Petitioner in person, he was to be given at least 7 days' period to deposit the money and clear the payment but 7 days' time was not given by the DDA. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking extension of date for payment of the remaining amounts and also for determination of the actual amount to be paid at the second stage.

4. On 24th June, 2020 this Court had granted an interim order subject to the Petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.4,33,485/- by 26th June, 2020. However, since the deadline had passed, the DDA's portal did not accept the payment of the Petitioner. The Petitioner, accordingly, placed the copy of the demand draft, which he had got prepared to show his bonafides. On 26th June, 2020, ld. counsel for the DDA made further submissions and also supplied the calculation of 20% Bid Premium Amount, which is to be deposited. The matter was then adjourned as it was expected that the DDA may extend the deadline for deposit.

5. Today, Ms. Mrinalini Sen, ld. counsel for Respondent has reverted with instructions and submits that the last date for payment of earnest money deposit has been extended for all applicants by DDA, till 15th July, 2020.

6. Mr. Rajesh Rai, submits that there is a dispute as to the actual amount payable as deposit and according to him, the amount payable is Rs.4,33,485/-. However, ld. counsel for DDA submits that the amount payable is as per clause 2.2 i.e. 20% of the bid amount has to be deposited by the Petitioner, which is Rs.17,03,322/-.

7. The calculations given by the parties is as under:

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40

a) Calculation given by the Petitioner:

"Amount to be deposited as per letter dated 17.06.2020 - Rs.4,33,485 /-

CALCULATION QUOTED PRICE: Rs 78,29,110 RESERVE PRICE: Rs 50,79,110 Quoted price exceeds the reserve price: Quoted Price (Rs 78,29,110) minus Reserve Price (Rs 50,79,110) = Rs 27,50,000 Therefore, the quoted price exceeds the reserve price by Rs 27,50,000 As per the Letter bearing no.

LD/LABR/0005/2019/AUC/F1-LAB-RESDL-I/523 dated 17.06.2020 25% of the quoted price exceeds the reserve price i.e., 25% of Rs 27,50,000 = Rs 6,87,500 5% Earnest Money Deposited is Rs 2,54,015. The amount by which 25% exceeds the reserve price is = Rs 4,33,485/-"

b) Calculation given by the Respondent/DDA:

"As per Clause 2.2 of the e-auction document: (At page 41) To be able to participate in e-auction, the prescribed EMD amounting to 25% of the bid premium is to be submitted in 2 stages as follows:

a) 5 percent of Reserve Price at first stage by all bidders, i.e.-

5% of Reserve Price = 5% of Rs. 50,79,110 = Rs. 2,53,955 (this amount stand paid)

b) 20% of the Bid Premium and difference of 5% reserve price at second stage by successful bidder within 7 days-

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40 20% of Rs. 78, 29,110 = Rs. 15,65,822/- and difference of 5% reserve price = 5% of 27,50,000 (Rs. 78,29,110 - Rs. 50,79,110) = Rs. 1,37,500/-

Therefore Amount to be paid by the Petitioner as per Clause 2.2 is = Rs. 2,53,955 + Rs. 15,65,822 + Rs. 1,37,500 which amounts to Rs. 19,54,277/-

Amount already Paid Rs. 2,53,955 Amount to be therefore paid by the Petitioner within 7 days of 18-6-2020 was = Rs. 17,03,322/- The Petitioner has failed to pay facilitation charges within 3 days of the issue of LOI. (Auction Processing fees equivalent to 0.95% of the H1 Bid + applicable GST)."

8. This Court has perused clauses 2.2 and 2.4 of the tender document, which read as under:

"2.2 Earnest Money Deposit: To be able to participate in e-auction, the prescribed EMD amounting to 25% of the bid premium is to be submitted in two stages as follows:

(a) 5% of the Reserve price at first stage by all Bidders i.e. before participation in the e- auction programme.

(b) 20% of the Bid premium and difference of 5% reserve price at second stage by successful bidder (H-1 Bidder) within seven days from the issue of LOI after acceptance of their bid by the competent authority.

(c) If the successful bidder fails to deposit balance 20% EMD (second stage) in 7 Day's period then EMD of 5% Submitted at the time of Participation would be forfeited.

(d) The EMD shall be payable on-line through NEFT/RTGS/E-PAYMENT on DDA's e-auction portal i.e. www.tenderwizard.com/DDAAUCTION.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40 Detailed instructions to guide the bidder through the e-Payment steps are available on the said portal/website.

(e) No offer/bid shall be accepted without successful payment of Earnest Money Deposit.

(f) The Earnest Money Deposit will be adjusted in the payment against the premium of bid Payable to the Authority by the successful Bidder (H-1 Bidder).

(g) The Earnest Money Deposit paid by the bidders, whose offers have not been accepted shall be returned to them without any interest. The same shall be refunded electronically in their Bank account of the unsuccessful bidders within 15 days of the completion of auction process. The advance deposit shall not be adjusted against any other scheme.

(h) Only the Bidders making payments of first stage EMD, will be allowed to participate in the e- auction process.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2.4 Evaluation of Bid 2.4.1. The accepting officer, subject to confirmation of the VC, DDA, normally accept the highest Bid for a plot, provided that it is above the reserve price and found to be competitive enough to reflect the market value of the plot auctioned for.

2.4.2. The confirmation of the highest Bid shall be in the sole discretion of the Vice Chairman, DDA who does not bind himself to confirm the highest bid and reserve to himself the right to reject all or any of the bid without assigning any reasons. Any Bid not fulfilling any of the prescribed conditions or incomplete in any respect shall be rejected. 2.4.3. After the bids are confirmed/accepted by the Competent Authority, a communication shall be sent to the successful bidder and the second

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40 stage EMD (20% of the premium offered) to be submitted within 7 days from the Date of issue of LOI online payment. In case the second stage EMD is not submitted within the stipulated period, the first stage EMD (5% of the reserve price) submitted along the Bid shall be forfeited. 2.4.4. After deposit of second stage EMD, the DDA shall issue a Demand -cum - Allotment Letter for the plot to the bidder whose bid has been accepted through registered post calling upon him to remit the balance 75% amount/premium of the bid offered within 90 (ninety) days of issue of this Letter.

2.4.5. In case the payment of balance premium is not received within the stipulated period as indicated above and in the Demand-cum-Allotment Letter, the bid shall automatically stand cancelled and the entire EMD (25% of premium offered) shall stand forfeited without any notice. In that eventuality, DDA shall be at liberty to re-auction the plot.

2.4.6. The VC or the Accepting Officer shall within 15 days of the date of completion of e- auction process, communicates to all other bidders, non-acceptance of their bids and return the earnest money received from them without any interest.

2.4.7 The bidder after submission of Bid shall not be permitted to withdraw, surrender or modify his bid on any ground whatsoever. If he withdraws or surrenders the Bid, the entire amount of earnest money shall be forfeited which shall be without prejudice to other rights or remedies available to DDA."

9. A perusal of the above clauses shows that there are three stages in this tender:

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40

a) Stage I: Stage I is when the bidder participates in the e-auction programme. At this stage, 5% of the reserve price is to be deposited by the bidder.

b) Stage II: Stage II occurs after the bid has been submitted by the bidder and the same has been found successful. The bid amount quoted by the bidder is higher than the reserve price. Once the bid was successful, the LOI is to be issued by the DDA. Within seven days of the issuance of the LOI, the amount to be deposited is:

i) 20% of the bid amount; and

ii) the difference of 5% reserve price and the bid amount. In effect, at this stage a total 20% of the bid amount is to be collected by the DDA.

c) Stage III: Stage III is the stage of issuance of Demand-cum-Allotment Letter, at which stage 75% of the bid amount is to be deposited.

10. The question that arises is, what is the amount that is to be paid at Stage II by the Petitioner.

11. A perusal of the calculation submitted by the DDA shows that the reserve price in this bid was Rs.50,79,110/-. The Petitioner's bid was Rs.78,29,110/-. Accordingly, at Stage I, the Petitioner had to deposit 5% of Rs.50,79,110 i.e., Rs.2,53,955/- which has been paid. At Stage II, the Petitioner has to pay the two amounts i.e., 20% of the bid amount i.e. Rs.15,65,852/- and 5% of the difference between the reserve price and the bid amount i.e., Rs.1,37,500/-. Thus, the total has been correctly calculated by the DDA as payable as Rs.17,03,322/-

12. The interpretation given by the Petitioner to clause 2.2(b) is not correct. The ultimate intention of the clauses is that in these three

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40 instalments, the entire bid amount should be paid to the DDA. Accordingly, the calculation given by the DDA is accepted.

13. The LOI was served upon the Petitioner only on 18 th June 2020. The said date has now been extended by the DDA till 15th July 2020. Thus, the Petitioner is entitled to avail of the extension for making the requisite payment. Mr. Rajesh Rai, submits that due to the Covid-19 pandemic, further extension of three months may be granted for payment of the deposit.

14. This Court is of the prima facie view that such extensions cannot be directed by the Court specifically qua the Petitioner. It is up to the DDA, to grant extensions, as a policy decision, due to the COVID-19 lockdown, which it has already done. No further extensions can be granted by the Court on its own, contrary to the bid conditions. Accordingly, at the interim stage, the only direction that the Court can pass is that the Petitioner shall deposit 20% of the bid amount in terms of clause 2.2 (b) i.e., Rs.17,03,322/- by 15th July 2020 or any other further date, as may be extended by the DDA as per its own policy decision. If the Petitioner fails to deposit the 20%, then the consequences would follow as per the conditions in the Tender.

15. The present application is disposed of in the above terms. W.P.(C) 3720/2020 & CRL.M.A. 13751/2020

16. Let the counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder to be filed within four weeks thereafter.

17. List for hearing on 25th August, 2020.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE JULY 01, 2020/dk/A

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH Signing Date:03.07.2020 15:40

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter