Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun [email protected] Bittu vs State Of (Nct) Delhi & Ors
2020 Latest Caselaw 249 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 249 Del
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2020

Delhi High Court
Arjun [email protected] Bittu vs State Of (Nct) Delhi & Ors on 15 January, 2020
$~36
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                 Date of decision: January 15, 2020
+      W.P.(CRL) 3622/2019 and CRL.M.A. 43729/2019

       ARJUN [email protected] BITTU                         ..... Petitioner

                         Through     Mr. Alok Bachawat and Mr. Uday
                                     Singh, Advocates alongwith
                                     petitioner in person

                         versus

       STATE OF (NCT) DELHI & ORS                 ..... Respondents

                         Through     Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the
                                     State with SI Vinod Bhati, P.S.:
                                     Kalkaji

                                     Respondent nos. 2 and 3 in person

CORAM:

       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

                         JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings against the two accused persons namely Mukesh Kumar and Tanvir have been quashed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court i.e. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru, today itself.

The petitioner Arun Kumar @ Bittu has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing

of FIR No. 574/2019, under sections 308/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at P.S.: Kalkaji and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

The petitioner and respondent nos.2 and 3 have submitted that they have settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 25.12.2019.

Respondent nos.2 and 3, who are present in Court, have reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that they have amicably settled their dispute. Respondent nos.2 and 3 further submitted that they have no objection to the FIR being quashed and the petition being allowed.

The Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, has identified the petitioner as well as respondent nos.2 and 3.

In view of the above settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 574/2019, under sections 308/341/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Kalkaji and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition alongwith pending application is disposed of accordingly.

(BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE JANUARY 15, 2020 savita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter