Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1374 Del
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2020
$~59, 61 & 62
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 2335/2020
Date of decision: 28.02.2020
TAGORE TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank
Rana and Mr. Abhishek Dhankar,
Advs.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing
Counsel with Mrs. Ankita, Adv. for
NCTE.
+ W.P.(C) 2337/2020
CENTRAL MODERN TT COLLEGE ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank
Rana and Mr. Abhishek Dhankar,
Advs.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing
Counsel with Mrs. Ankita, Adv. for
NCTE.
+ W.P.(C) 2338/2020
DEEP INTERNATIONAL TT SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank
Rana and Mr. Abhishek Dhankar,
Advs.
versus
W.P. (C) 2335/2020 & Connected Page 1 of 4
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing
Counsel with Mrs. Ankita, Adv. for
NCTE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
ORDER
% 28.02.2020
1. Issue notice. Ms. Dwivedi accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal.
3. These writ petitions articulate a common grievance, which is, that their applications qua concerned courses have not been processed despite compliance by the petitioners.
4. Briefly, the petitioners filed applications for being granted recognition to run D.EL.ED course.
5. It is averred that, in some cases, inspections were conducted, while in others, inspections were not conducted.
6. What is common to these cases is that a decision was taken by the Northern Regional Committee (in short "NRC") to issue a show cause notice.
7. The petitioners, in some cases, responded to the formal show cause notice issued by the NRC, while in other cases, they did not await the issuance of a formal show cause notice to file their respective replies to decision taken by the NRC.
8. The replies by the petitioners in the aforementioned matters were filed on the following dates:
Writ Petitions Nos. Date of Reply
W.P.(C) 2335/2020 15.03.2019
W.P.(C) 2337/2020 25.03.2019
W.P.(C) 2338/2020 26.02.2019
9. It is the petitioners' case that, thereafter, the NRC has convened 13 meetings but there has been no movement in the matter.
10. According to Mr. Sharawat, this has impacted the interest of the petitioners. Mr. Sharawat says that in all the captioned matters, the applications were filed in December 2012.
11. Ms. Dwivedi, on the other hand, says that the petitioners could have approached the Court earlier rather than at the nth hour when the cut-off date for academic session 2020-2021 is around the corner.
12. To my mind, the respondents are certainly at fault in not processing the applications filed by the petitioners after compliance was made by them.
13. That being said, the petitioners are also at fault, if not fully, albeit, partially, as they could have approached the Court earlier and not allowed 13 meetings to pass before instituting the captioned petitions.
14. In these circumstances, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the concerned regional Committee i.e.
Western Regional Committee (in short 'WRC')1 to take necessary steps in the matters, if possible, before 3.3.2020, which is the cut-off date fixed for academic session 2020-2021.
15. Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 28, 2020 rb
As per the terms of the Gazette Notification dated 27.01.2020 issued by the National Council for Teacher Education.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!