Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1331 Del
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2020
$~57
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 27.02.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 1114/2020
ATUL GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through Md.Zahid, Adv. with Mr.Anil Kumar,
Adv. with petitioners in person.
versus
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State.
SI Narender Kumar PS I P Estate.
Mr.Firoz Ahmad, Adv. for R-2 with
R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 4376/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
Crl.M.A. 4375/2020
3. In view of the reasons stated in the application, delay of 31 days in re-
filing the petition is condoned.
4. The application is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
CRL.M.C.1114/2020
5. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of
FIR No.456/2015 dated 31.12.2015 registered at Police Station New Delhi
and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
6. Notice issued.
7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for
respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition
is taken up for final disposal.
8. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 01.05.2012 as per
Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners
and respondent no.2, they started living separately.
9. Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before Counselling
Cell, Family Courts, Patiala House, New Delhi vide settlement deed dated
03.06.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
10. The total settlement amount is ₹4,70,000/-(Rupees Four Lakhs
Seventy Thousand only). It is submitted that the respondent no. 2 has
already received an amount of ₹3,29,000/- (Rupees Three Lacs Twenty Nine
Thousand only). A demand draft bearing No.842645 dated 10.01.2020 for
the balance amount of ₹1,41,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty One Thousand
only) is handed over to the respondent no. 2 today in the Court.
11. Complainant/Respondent no.2 is present in person and has been
identified by SI Narender Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been
settled, therefore, she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
12. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any
further.
13. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.456/2015 dated 31.12.2015
registered at Police Station New Delhi and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
14. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
15. Order dasti
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 27, 2020 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!